BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Percentile rankings

Post your questions about customer service issues, GMAT exam policies, and GMAT exam structure. Get an official answer from GMAC, the organization behind the GMAT test!
Expert replies
by machichi » Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:49 pm
I am curious if GMAC has ever tracked or release data on the number of people who score above, say a 700 for example. The percentiles, as I understand them, are based on the number of exams taken, not what percent of people have received that score. With so many people taking the exam 2, 3 even 5 times, I bet a large number of people actually receive that coveted 700+ score. Basically I'm incredulous of the implication that a 700 means that you outperformed 90% of people. Really it just means that thousands take the exam the first time and don't do as well as they'd like and retake until they get the score they want.

Thoughts?
Join the discussion
Source: — Ask the Test Maker |

by OfficialGMAT » Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:14 pm
Hi, Machici. You are correct that the Percentile Ranking table is based on the total number of exams taken during the timeframe reported, not the total number of people who have taken the exam. However, it is not that case that any test-taker can retake the exam as many times as necessary until he achieves a 700. While this may be true for a very small number of test-takers, the likelihood that a test-taker will score a 700 or above often depends on whether or not he had a high score on the first attempt.

About one-fifth of test-takers retake the exam, and they take the exam 2 -3 times. Some take four times or more, but most repeat test-takers are just repeating one or two times. Those retaking the exam may score higher and often can expect some score gains. For example, those who score between 600 and 690 may expect an average score increase of about 20 points when retaking the exam. However, the score gain is much smaller than 20 points with more attempts. Please keep in mind that scores can also go down. You can learn more about repeat testing here: https://www.gmac.com/~/media/Files/gmac/ ... esting.pdf.
Leah
Official GMAC Representative

Have a question about customer service issues, GMAT exam policies, or GMAT exam structure? Post your question in our Ask the Test Maker forum!
Join the discussion

by machichi » Mon Jul 30, 2012 1:33 pm
I love this PDF, so interesting. Thanks, Rebecca!
Blogging about the MBA application process. Because I need to do something with all this bschool energy.
https://www.mbabreakaway.com/
Recent post: July 12, "Summer"
Join the discussion