BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Percentage Problem

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shanrizvi » Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:48 pm
I have come up with a very easy way to do questions like these.

Basically, remember this as a rule: if you have the arithmetic means for X, Y and X&Y, you can a) know which of them has a higher weight, and b) the ratio X:Y. Plot the averages on a number line.

---X----(X&Y)---------Y

Basically, if (X&Y) is closer to X, X has a greater weight.

The ratio X:Y is Y-(X&Y):X-(X&Y)
[NOTE: The calculation uses AVERAGES of Y, X&Y and X]
Join the discussion

by shanrizvi » Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:54 pm
Using the above prescribed method:

The question gives us the following information:

Am=9.8
Af=9.1
(The average number of years of work experience for the male/female employees)

And asks us to calculate the M:F ratio.

Statement 1: There are 52 make employees at the company. This doesn't tell us anything. Definitely not sufficient to calculate the M:F ratio. INSUFFICIENT.

Lets look at Statement 2. Amf=9.3 (The average number of work experience for all employees)

Lets plot this on a number line.

9.1(Af)--9.3(Amf)-----9.8(Am)
<----0.2----><-----0.5----->

M:F
2:5

SUFFICIENT. The answer should be B.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:55 pm
shanrizvi wrote:Using the above prescribed method:

The question gives us the following information:

Am=9.8
Af=9.1
(The average number of years of work experience for the male/female employees)

And asks us to calculate the M:F ratio.

Statement 1: There are 52 make employees at the company. This doesn't tell us anything. Definitely not sufficient to calculate the M:F ratio. INSUFFICIENT.

Lets look at Statement 2. Amf=9.3 (The average number of work experience for all employees)

Lets plot this on a number line.

9.1(Af)--9.3(Amf)-----9.8(Am)
<----0.2----><-----0.5----->

M:F
2:5

SUFFICIENT. The answer should be B.
Could you Pleaseeeeeeeee tell me how could you solve for number of employees when all these averages are about male and female average work experience?!!

Also, the ration for males to females seems should be 5:2 not 2:5 ?

Thanks a lot
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:01 am
A(m) = 9.8
A(f) = 9.1

n(m)/n(f) = ?

(1)
n(m) = 52 - not sufficient

(2)

X = n(m), Y = n(f)
9.3 = 9.8*X + 9.1*Y/ X+Y

You can get the ratio .. hence B is sufficient
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:38 am
viju9162. Why did you put x and y in the numerator? seems to me that the average years of experience for both will be (9.1 + 9.8)/(x + y)= 9.3 in other words, why 9.1Y + 9.8X ?
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:23 pm
If you look the average formula

Avg = Sum of all the numbers / total numbers.

Sum of all the numbers in this case will be Avg(M) * total number(M) ..hence in the numerator, we take 9.1Y + 9.8X..

I hope this helps ...
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion