Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Percentage Problem

Expert replies
by chetanojha » Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:53 am
Can somebody help me with this GMATprep question or provide link if it exist already?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shanrizvi » Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:48 pm
I have come up with a very easy way to do questions like these.

Basically, remember this as a rule: if you have the arithmetic means for X, Y and X&Y, you can a) know which of them has a higher weight, and b) the ratio X:Y. Plot the averages on a number line.

---X----(X&Y)---------Y

Basically, if (X&Y) is closer to X, X has a greater weight.

The ratio X:Y is Y-(X&Y):X-(X&Y)
[NOTE: The calculation uses AVERAGES of Y, X&Y and X]
Join the discussion

by shanrizvi » Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:54 pm
Using the above prescribed method:

The question gives us the following information:

Am=9.8
Af=9.1
(The average number of years of work experience for the male/female employees)

And asks us to calculate the M:F ratio.

Statement 1: There are 52 make employees at the company. This doesn't tell us anything. Definitely not sufficient to calculate the M:F ratio. INSUFFICIENT.

Lets look at Statement 2. Amf=9.3 (The average number of work experience for all employees)

Lets plot this on a number line.

9.1(Af)--9.3(Amf)-----9.8(Am)
<----0.2----><-----0.5----->

M:F
2:5

SUFFICIENT. The answer should be B.
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:55 pm
shanrizvi wrote:Using the above prescribed method:

The question gives us the following information:

Am=9.8
Af=9.1
(The average number of years of work experience for the male/female employees)

And asks us to calculate the M:F ratio.

Statement 1: There are 52 make employees at the company. This doesn't tell us anything. Definitely not sufficient to calculate the M:F ratio. INSUFFICIENT.

Lets look at Statement 2. Amf=9.3 (The average number of work experience for all employees)

Lets plot this on a number line.

9.1(Af)--9.3(Amf)-----9.8(Am)
<----0.2----><-----0.5----->

M:F
2:5

SUFFICIENT. The answer should be B.
Could you Pleaseeeeeeeee tell me how could you solve for number of employees when all these averages are about male and female average work experience?!!

Also, the ration for males to females seems should be 5:2 not 2:5 ?

Thanks a lot
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:01 am
A(m) = 9.8
A(f) = 9.1

n(m)/n(f) = ?

(1)
n(m) = 52 - not sufficient

(2)

X = n(m), Y = n(f)
9.3 = 9.8*X + 9.1*Y/ X+Y

You can get the ratio .. hence B is sufficient
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:38 am
viju9162. Why did you put x and y in the numerator? seems to me that the average years of experience for both will be (9.1 + 9.8)/(x + y)= 9.3 in other words, why 9.1Y + 9.8X ?
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:23 pm
If you look the average formula

Avg = Sum of all the numbers / total numbers.

Sum of all the numbers in this case will be Avg(M) * total number(M) ..hence in the numerator, we take 9.1Y + 9.8X..

I hope this helps ...
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion