BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Pazyryk valley

Expert replies
by neeti2711 » Thu Mar 02, 2017 12:22 am
A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ring's thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.

Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologists' success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?

(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.
(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.

OA: C

Why not B?

Since trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys, and since the tombs builders used only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley - this combination helps to determine the relative ages of the tombs of Pazyryk site.

However C discusses only about the logs in the tombs. It is not necessary that these logs came from Pazyryk Valley

Source: Aristotle Prep CR
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ceilidh.erickson » Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:24 am
Here's the general chronology of this argument:

--> trees grow to a certain age --->
--> they're chopped down to make tombs --->
--> archeologists find those tombs some unknown number of years later --->
--> they look at the logs to know how old the trees were --->
--> knowing how old the trees were when they were chopped down tells us WHEN they were chopped down, i.e. how old the tombs are.

So what's missing in the argument as it stands? Something that connects the age of the trees to the age of the tombs. They could have used 50-yr-old logs on tombs built 100 years ago, or 50-year-old logs on tombs built 2500 years ago. How would we know?

With each answer choice, we need to ask: does this connect the age of the tree to a particular period in time?

(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombs' remaining artefacts.

This has nothing to do with the age of the trees. Incorrect.

(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
This would make them distinctive ACROSS TIME. We could look at the trees and determine WHERE they came from, but not WHEN.

(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.
These trees exhibit a specific pattern. If historians have records that indicate that this exact pattern - 6 drought + 3 rainy + 6 drought - happened only once in the history of that region, we would know that that must have been the time period just before the tombs were built. Correct!

(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
To my earlier point, this could still be true in 100 yr-old tombs or 2500 yr-old tombs.

(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artefacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.
This doesn't tell us anything about how the TREES give us info on the tombs' age.

The correct answer is C.

Does that help?
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by neeti2711 » Sat Mar 11, 2017 10:46 pm
Ceilidh,

Thank you for the easy explanation!
Join the discussion