BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Patents - weaken

Expert replies
by szDave » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:43 am
Hello,

I think the correct answer is C, if yes, why or why not?

In countries in which new life-sustaining drugs cannot be patented, such drugs are sold at widely affordable prices; those same drugs, where patented, command premium prices because the patents shield patent-holding manufacturers from competitors. These facts show that future access to new life-sustaining drugs can be improved if the practice of granting patents on newly developed life-sustaining drugs were to be abolished everywhere.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

a) In countries in which life-sustaining drugs cannot be patented, their manufacture is nevertheless a profitable enterprise.

b) Countries that do not currently grant patents on life-sustaining drugs are, for the most part, countries with large populations.

c) In some countries specific processes for the manufacture of pharmaceutical drugs can be patented even in cases in which the drugs themselves cannot be patented.

d) Pharmaceutical companies can afford the research that goes into the development of new drugs only if patents allow them to earn high profits.

e) Countries that grant patents on life-sustaining drugs almost always ban their importation from countries that do not grant such patents.
Last edited by szDave on Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shenoydevika » Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:17 am
Hello!

Ok I believe the correct answer is D

That is just my gut feeling. I'm sorry I can't give you an explanation why I think it is correct.
Join the discussion

by charu_mahajan » Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:38 am
The argument concludes - future access to new life-sustaining drugs can be improved if the practice of granting patents were abolished

To Weaken this we need to find something that tells us that future access to new drugs will NOT be improved in case we abolish patents.

Consider option D - Pharmaceutical companies can afford the research that goes into the development of new drugs only if patents allow them to earn high profits. The money for research of new drugs will come from the patents' money. This makes our argument look like -

future access to new life-sustaining drugs CANNOT be improved if the practice of granting patents were abolished or

future access to new life-sustaining drugs can be improved if the practice of granting patents were NOT abolished

and hence is the CORRECT weakener.
Join the discussion