Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Passenger jets

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:42 am
With an ASSUMPTION question, your goal is to find a logical gap between the stated conclusion and the premises given.

Conclusion: charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal - of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division - are false

Premise: 1994 - hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker.

Logical Gap: Is the reduction in waste output per worker the same as a reduction in the total yearly amount? What if we had 10 times as many workers this year?

Assumption: The author must be assuming that we don't have a lot more workers this year, so that a per-person reduction indicates and overall reduction.

A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1994.
Irrelevant - the argument only cares about hazardous waste.

B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994.
Irrelevant - the argument is only concerned with waste, not with production of jets.

C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.
Irrelevant - we don't care about other divisions. The argument is only about the passenger-jet division.

D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.
This seems tempting, because we're getting into per-worker metrics. But, this argument didn't address anything about hours. It just discusses hazardous waste per worker per year. Irrelevant.

E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.
Bingo! This is the only one that addresses the gap between per-worker waste and total waste.

The answer is E.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:48 am
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion