Hi kobelco - Welcome to Beat the GMAT!

These can be difficult questions for sure. The main reasons that a school's ranking matters are that it attracts higher-caliber students, oftentimes there's more funding available for scholarships, and it generally will get significantly more attention from recruiters than a lower-ranked or unranked MBA program. (These are all correlated factors, not causal, of course.) So the standard advice is, go to the best school that you can in terms of reputation. This typically means you'll have more opportunities available - and where this can matter the most is in your first post-MBA job. That's because the salary you get at the first job out the door of the program will largely dictate your earnings trajectory for the rest of your life. So yes, there's a $20k difference in tuition, but if you can get an additional $5k (or more!) in starting salary, then Carlson will make up for that pretty quickly.

Now, it really really depends on your locale and what the employers in your area, and in your industry, care about. Sometimes the difference doesn't matter so much.

In fact, we recently responded to someone with a similar question in the LA area and we basically said to go for the cheaper school - the opposite of what we're suggesting to you. You can see that thread here: https://www.beatthegmat.com/pepperdine-v ... 25268.html

The main reason for the difference in our answers is, Pepperdine is not considered as good a school as Carlson, and we don't see Pepperdine as worth $25k more than LMU. But that's our perspective as an outsider; EssaySnark is not an employer in the LA area (or the Twin Cities area) who's looking to hire these graduates. THAT's really where you need to be doing your research.

Start with the schools. Get their employment placement reports. Talk to their career services people.

Then, talk to the companies. Reach out to the HR departments of the companies you'd want to work for in the area. Or just go talk to your boss, or the CEO of your company if he/she is accessible. See what other people say about these two schools.

You can get a great feel for how they're regarded through conversations like that. It should help you understand the differences (way more than some anonymous 'Snark on the interwebs can do!!).

The other approach of course: Apply to both schools and see which one(s) admit you!! That could make this whole thing moot.

Please come back and let us know what you find, and what you decide to do. Will be interested to hear your strategies!

EssaySnark

Thanks EssaySnark!

I am applying to both, and figure that I have a decent shot at both. Will post an update when I know.

Awesome - good luck and let us know how it goes!

kobelco wrote:What are the chances that I will be seeing a significant increase in salary after MBA to compensate for the 20 more grand (compared to Opus) spent at Carlson?

Hard to say without knowing exactly what your function is in IT. However, if you have been progressively moving in your IT career, then chances are that you will not make significant increase, if any, in your post-MBA career. If you want to stay at least at your pre-MBA earnings level you will have to stay with IT and look for vertical movement in it when the opportunity comes up. MBA will not have decisive effect in your upward mobility within IT though. But it may be a plus on your resume, or a differentiator for some positions.
If you want to change careers, you will definitely have to take a hit in your salary, at least initially, for another ~5-7 years. That's because you will have to start at MBA entry-level position in your new field.
I am saying this from my own experience and observations of my classmates at GW part-time MBA. Everyone I know who entered the program from IT field (and had at least 5-7 years of progressive experience) stayed in that field a year after graduation. The reason is the same for everyone: entry-level MBA positions do not match what they are making in their IT roles.
Essentially, part-time MBA will not help you earn more than you should be making know, if you have been working the IT field properly in the last 10 years.
This is not to say that MBA degree is totally worthless for IT guys. But it is not an instant income booster for IT pros with experience. Look at it at as long-term investment in yourself .
The story could be different for full-time top 5(-10-15?) MBA programs where you could try to ride just on the school brand name.

On the other hand, if you really want to change the field, do not have significant financial obligations, and ready to take a plunge and lower salary than what you make now, then, as was mentioned in the post above, take a higher ranked school with better reputation.

Thanks beatvit, for a different perspective.

I'm a programmer, in a niche field. I don't expect to move to a job in a new vertical, say, finance, the day I graduate. I know changing fields in mid-career can be tough. What I'm looking at is long term. Five year, 10 years down the line, would my earning potential be impacted by the choice I make between UST and UofM.

Kobelco, some thoughts in response to your latest question. There is a notion that the value of having MBA degree on your resume diminishes with time. So 5-10 years from graduation you will be valued on your actual accomplishments, whether it is the new field or your growth in IT. However, to get in the new field, or move up in the IT, the reputation (read: ranking) of the program is still important.
A year after graduation I don't remember many of the things I studied at business school, but many people around would give credit to the GW brand, which is reasonably high around DC area. I think this will be true years from now too.
Same is true in your situation. A graduate in the lowest percentile of his/her class from the top 5 MBA programs will almost always be perceived more favorably than the person from the top of the class from, say, top 15 programs. Because no one would know their actual academic record, but everyone would recognize the brand.
I am not very familiar with particular schools you are considering, but if the the spread in rankings (and perception) is significant, go for more reputable school. Speaking about perception, in my research of MBA programs Opus never hit my radar, but I at least remember Carlson name. Hope it helps.

essaysnark wrote:Awesome - good luck and let us know how it goes!

I scored a 660 on the GMAT. 6/6 on the AWA. 5/8 on IR.

Got accepted to both the Carlson School of Management (University of Minnesota) and Opus College of Business (University of St. Thomas). Leaning towards the Carlson program.

kobelco wrote:

essaysnark wrote:Awesome - good luck and let us know how it goes!

I scored a 660 on the GMAT. 6/6 on the AWA. 5/8 on IR.

Got accepted to both the Carlson School of Management (University of Minnesota) and Opus College of Business (University of St. Thomas). Leaning towards the Carlson program.

Wow kobelco - you remembered to come back and fill us in on your results - very cool! And very cool to see the admits you racked up. We'd be leaning towards Carlson too, but it is an individual and quite personal choice. Carlson is better-known as far as bschools go, as you're probably aware. That can be an advantage in recruiting, but it really depends on your industry (not sure that there would be a major difference in the two for IT recruiting).

Anyway, congratulations on your success! And thanks for sharing the news. Always fun to see it.

EssaySnark

I would say the $20k in this case is very much worth it. In the grand scheme of things it is not a huge amount of money. It will give you far more flexibility down the line. Especially if you ever look to move out of the area. You'll also be able to tap into a stronger undergraduate network from Minnesota.