BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Parallel Structure confusion... "-ing" words

Expert replies
by Stockmoose16 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:28 pm
I'm confused about parallel structure regarding "ing" words . Here's an example:

The phone rings, startling Molly.

OR

The phone rings, which startles Molly.

Because the word, "rings" is used, does that mean "startl-ING" is incorrect? Do both verbs have to end in "s," as in the second sentence. Can someone please explain?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by bourne159 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:47 pm
I am not sure if you are asking the parallelism question using correct examples. The sentences you wrote are more suited to discuss modifiers.
There is no parallelism issue with these sentences..

The phone rings, startling ..........
The above is correct usage of a sentence because startling is modifying the verb rings.

The second sentence The phone rings, which startles.... is not right usage.
Which is an adjective modifier which modifies the noun just before the comma. In the above sentence rings is not a noun.

As to parallelism the subjects, verbs and number(plural or singular) should be parallel.
Join the discussion

by Stockmoose16 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:32 pm
bourne159 wrote:I am not sure if you are asking the parallelism question using correct examples. The sentences you wrote are more suited to discuss modifiers.
There is no parallelism issue with these sentences..

The phone rings, startling ..........
The above is correct usage of a sentence because startling is modifying the verb rings.

The second sentence The phone rings, which startles.... is not right usage.
Which is an adjective modifier which modifies the noun just before the comma. In the above sentence rings is not a noun.

As to parallelism the subjects, verbs and number(plural or singular) should be parallel.
I'm not sure I totally understand. If verbs need to be in parallel, wouldn't rings (a verb) and startling (a verb) need to be the same tense?

What about in the following sentence:

Molly rebuffs Zach's move, citing that her kids should know about their relationship the rest of the world.

Shouldn't rebuffs and citing be the same tense here... meaning that citing should be the same tense as "rebuffs"?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1