Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

one or none

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:43 am
Solve the inequality 3^(3x-2) > 1.

(A) x > 1
(B) x > 3
(C) x > 2/3
(D) x > 1/3
(E) none of the above
The mind is everything. What you think you become. –Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rag_gmat » Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:51 am
x>2/3
Join the discussion

by mjjking » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:24 am
x>1 IMO.

to be 3^3x-2>1 we need 3x-2>=1, hence 3x-2 >=1 --> x>=1

Am I wrong?

if x>2/3, x could be 3/4 and 3^(3*3/4-2)<1... right?
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:34 am
mjjking: in order to solve this inequality, you need to remember that a^0 = 1, with a being a real number except 0. This means that 3^(3x - 2) > 1 is equivalent to 3^(3x - 2) > 3^0 or that 3x - 2 > 0.

This will in turn provide the answer : 3x > 2, x > 2/3
Join the discussion

by mygmat.2009 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:34 am
if 3x-2 = 0, we get 3^0 = 1, so we want anything greater than that

==> 3x - 2 > 0
==> 3x > 2
==> x > 2/3


IMO
Ans is (C)



Cheers,
Sam
Join the discussion

by marouan » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:37 am
Am I wrong? Ya .. you miss it on that part :
to be 3^3x-2>1 we need 3x-2>=1,
you rather need it to be more than 0 , because 3^0=1 !!!!!!
so here is the solution ( just like you did , but replacing the 1 by 0)

3x-2>0 => x > 2/3 !!
Join the discussion

by mjjking » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:52 am
thanks folks, stupid mistake!! :oops:
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:50 am
If 3^x > 3^y, does it always mean x > y?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. –Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:55 am
The exponential function is an injective function, so my answer will be yes.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:01 am
DanaJ wrote:The exponential function is an injective function, so my answer will be yes.
Take your time :)
The mind is everything. What you think you become. –Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by senthil » Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:54 am
I'd rather blindly folow it the way I have learnt to solve ...

let a = 3x-2 ;

3^a > 1 ... Take log on both sides

alog3 > log1... log (1) is always zero.

therfore , a>0
3x-2>0
3x>2
x> 2/3......


Hope thats clear !!
Thanks
Senthil

It seems impossible until its done.
Join the discussion