BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

one or none

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:43 am
Solve the inequality 3^(3x-2) > 1.

(A) x > 1
(B) x > 3
(C) x > 2/3
(D) x > 1/3
(E) none of the above
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rag_gmat » Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:51 am
x>2/3
Join the discussion

by mjjking » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:24 am
x>1 IMO.

to be 3^3x-2>1 we need 3x-2>=1, hence 3x-2 >=1 --> x>=1

Am I wrong?

if x>2/3, x could be 3/4 and 3^(3*3/4-2)<1... right?
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:34 am
mjjking: in order to solve this inequality, you need to remember that a^0 = 1, with a being a real number except 0. This means that 3^(3x - 2) > 1 is equivalent to 3^(3x - 2) > 3^0 or that 3x - 2 > 0.

This will in turn provide the answer : 3x > 2, x > 2/3
Join the discussion

by mygmat.2009 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:34 am
if 3x-2 = 0, we get 3^0 = 1, so we want anything greater than that

==> 3x - 2 > 0
==> 3x > 2
==> x > 2/3


IMO
Ans is (C)



Cheers,
Sam
Join the discussion

by marouan » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:37 am
Am I wrong? Ya .. you miss it on that part :
to be 3^3x-2>1 we need 3x-2>=1,
you rather need it to be more than 0 , because 3^0=1 !!!!!!
so here is the solution ( just like you did , but replacing the 1 by 0)

3x-2>0 => x > 2/3 !!
Join the discussion

by mjjking » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:52 am
thanks folks, stupid mistake!! :oops:
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:50 am
If 3^x > 3^y, does it always mean x > y?
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:55 am
The exponential function is an injective function, so my answer will be yes.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:01 am
DanaJ wrote:The exponential function is an injective function, so my answer will be yes.
Take your time :)
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by senthil » Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:54 am
I'd rather blindly folow it the way I have learnt to solve ...

let a = 3x-2 ;

3^a > 1 ... Take log on both sides

alog3 > log1... log (1) is always zero.

therfore , a>0
3x-2>0
3x>2
x> 2/3......


Hope thats clear !!
Thanks
Senthil

It seems impossible until its done.
Join the discussion