BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Sep 13, 2018 8:52 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2

OA C

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:28 am
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2

OA C

Source: Official Guide
Given: On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t.

Question: Is t < 0?

Let's take each statement one by one.

(1) -1 < r < 0

We do not have any information about point T. Insufficient.

(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2.

Certainly insufficient. T can be on either side of the number line. Insufficient.

(1) and (2) together

We know that the coordinate of point R is -1 < r < 0 and the distance between R and T is equal to r^2.

Note that if -1 < r < 0, r^2 < |r|

Thus, the coordinate of point T must also be negative. Sufficient.

The correct answer: C

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GRE Prep

Locations: GRE Classes Seattle | GMAT Prep Course Hong Kong | GRE Prep San Francisco | SAT Prep Classes NYC | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:25 pm
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2

Source: Official Guide
\[t\,\,\mathop < \limits^? \,\,0\]
\[\left( 1 \right)\,\,\, - 1 < r < 0\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
\,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {r,t} \right) = \left( { - 0.5,0} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{NO}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\
\,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {r,t} \right) = \left( { - 0.5, - 1} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\]
\[\left( 2 \right)\,\,\,\left| {r - t} \right| = {r^2}\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
\,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {r,t} \right) = \left( {0,0} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{NO}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\
\,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {r,t} \right) = \left( { - 1, - 2} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\]
\[\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\left| {r - t} \right| = {r^2}\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{{\text{squaring}}} \,\,\,\,\,{\left( {r - t} \right)^2} = {r^4}\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,{r^2} - 2rt + {t^2} = {r^4}\,\,\,\,\,\left( * \right)\]
\[ - 1 < r < 0\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,{r^4} < {r^2}\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( * \right)} \,\,\,\,\, - 2rt + {t^2} = {r^4} - {r^2} < 0\]
\[\left. \begin{gathered}
- 2rt + {t^2} < 0 \hfill \\
{t^2} \geqslant 0 \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right\}\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\, - 2rt < 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{r\, < \,\,0} \,\,\,t < 0\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,{\text{SUFF}}.\,\]


This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

BTGmoderatorDC wrote:
Thu Sep 13, 2018 8:52 pm
On the number line, point R has coordinate r and point T has coordinate t. Is t < 0?

(1) -1 < r < 0
(2) The distance between R and T is equal to r^2

OA C

Source: Official Guide
Target question: Is t NEGATIVE?

Statement 1: -1 < r < 0
No information about t
So, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The distance between R and T is equal to r²
There are several values of r and t that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: r = -1 and t = -2. The distance between r and t is 1 (aka r²). So, these values of r and t satisfy statement 2. In this case, t IS negative
Case b: r = -1 and t = 0. The distance between r and t is 1 (aka r²). So, these values of r and t satisfy statement 2. In this case, t is NOT negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that -1 < r < 0
ASIDE: If j and k are on the number line, then |j - k| = the distance between j and k
So, from statement 2, we can write: |t - r| = r²

-----------------ASIDE-------------------------------------
There are 3 steps to solving equations involving ABSOLUTE VALUE:
1. Apply the rule that says: If |x| = k, then x = k and/or x = -k
2. Solve the resulting equations
3. Plug solutions into original equation to check for extraneous roots
--------BACK TO THE QUESTION---------------------------

Since |t - r| = r², we'll examine two possible cases:
t - r = r² and t - r = -(r²)

case a: t - r = r²
Rearrange to get: t = r + r²
Factor: t = r(1 + r)
Since -1 < r < 0, we can conclude that (1 + r) is POSITIVE
So, t = r(1 + r) = (NEGATIVE)(POSITIVE) = NEGATIVE
So, t is negative

case b: t - r = -(r²)
Rearrange to get: t = r - r²
Factor: t = r(1 - r)
Since -1 < r < 0, we can conclude that (1 - r) is POSITIVE
So, t = r(1 - r) = (NEGATIVE)(POSITIVE) = NEGATIVE
So, t is negative

In both of the two possible cases, t is negative
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion