BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

On Account Of Crab

Expert replies
by mundasingh123 » Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:58 am
The golden crab of the Gulf of Mexico has not been fished commercially in great numbers, primarily on
account of living at great depths-- 2,500 to 3,000 feet down.
(A) on account of living
(B) on account of their living
(C) because it lives
(D) because of living
(E) being they live

Could someone confirm whether "on account of " and "because of " are really undiomatic
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GmatKiss » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:02 am
IMO :C

OA please!
Join the discussion

by SticklorForDetails » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:19 am
"on account of" is okay, but "because" is shorter (1 word instead of 3) and has the exact same meaning. Thus, "on account of" could be in the right answer, but here when we're given a better option we should take it.

"because of" is not unidiomatic, but should only be used with a noun. For example: "I am going to take the GMAT because of my ambition to go to business school." It should not be used with a gerund because a gerund should not follow a preposition. That is the awkwardness rule at play here. So "of living" is awkward compared to "it lives," used properly within an adverbial clause introduce by the subordinating conjunction "because."
Experienced tutors, customized study plans, personalized service.

www.GothamTutors.com/adam.html
Join the discussion

by vietmoi999 » Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:35 pm
SticklorForDetails wrote:"on account of" is okay, but "because" is shorter (1 word instead of 3) and has the exact same meaning. Thus, "on account of" could be in the right answer, but here when we're given a better option we should take it.

"because of" is not unidiomatic, but should only be used with a noun. For example: "I am going to take the GMAT because of my ambition to go to business school." It should not be used with a gerund because a gerund should not follow a preposition. That is the awkwardness rule at play here. So "of living" is awkward compared to "it lives," used properly within an adverbial clause introduce by the subordinating conjunction "because."
why Gerund can not follow a preposition.? pls, explain more

a gerund is used to refer to general action not of specific subject in the main clause when there is no action noun

a participle is used to refer to specific action of a specific subject in the main clause. the action in the participle is in the same time with the time of main clause.

in this sentence, "living " can not be a gerund because we need that "living" refers to the crab. In this sentense, "living" is not participle because we do not need "living" happen simultaneously with "has not been". So, "living" both as particile or as gerund is not suitable here.

experts, this is question from og 10 and we can think it is too old to study . but, there are many similar questions in gmatprep, so it is worth studying this question.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1