BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG97- Bold faced argument

Expert replies
by y_roy82 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:46 pm
For bold faced arguments like the one below, the second bold faced part "for a given..." is a part of the sentence which itself is a question. A couple of options state- "second part calls that into question", these options look attractive.

When dealing with such questions are we supposed to ignore the whole sentence and just concentrate on the bold part?

Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to
new technologies powered by electricity.
The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that
for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did
formerly.
The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to
power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of
output is held constant.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that
conclusion.
(8) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that
conclusion.
(e) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into
question.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sunnyjohn » Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:28 pm
I use following strategy to solve Bold face questions. I have been quite successful with it.

Step 1: Identify Facts, Premise, and Conclusions.

Fact : Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity.

Conclusion: for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly.

Premise: Since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of
output is held constant.

As you can see that - First bold face is a FACT and second boldface is a Conclusion which is supported by Premise.

Normally I look for one bold face statement for which I am 200% sure. For example - In current case I am so sure that 2nd boldface is conclusion.

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion. ( NO - Second bold face is a conclusion )
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion. ( Contender )
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
( No - Second bold face is a conclusion )
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question. ( No - Second bold face is conclusion )
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument. ( No - Second bold face is conclusion).


Its clear the B is the answer. ( you can also confirm it by the fact that FACT was in favor of conclusion ).
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:00 am
Totally agree

my answer is B
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by artistocrat » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:32 pm
OG97?! Hook me up! Forget OG12!
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:01 pm
Answer is B.

I do recommend the procedure from SunnyJohn.

If you need more help, I have done a lot of work on Bold face questions. If I chose it right, let me know. I can send you the detailed study for them.
Join the discussion