BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG2019 -Logical flow

Expert replies
by Mo2men » Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:25 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Psychologist: In a study, researchers gave 100 volunteers a psychological questionnaire designed to measure their self-esteem. The researchers then asked each volunteer to rate the strength of his or her own social skills. The volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem consistently rated themselves as having much better social skills than did the volunteers with moderate levels. This suggests that attaining an exceptionally high level of self-esteem greatly improves one's social skills.

The psychologist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which of the following grounds?

A. It fails to adequately address the possibility that many of the volunteers may not have understood what the psychological questionnaire was designed to measure.

B. It takes for granted that the volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem had better social skills than did the other volunteers, even before the former volunteers had attained their high levels of self-esteem.

C. It overlooks the possibility that people with very high levels of self-esteem may tend to have a less accurate perception of the strength of their own social skills than do people with moderate levels of self-esteem.

D. It relies on evidence from a group of volunteers that is too small to provide any support for any inferences regarding people in general.

E. It overlooks the possibility that factors other than level of self-esteem may be of much greater importance in determining the strength of one's social skills.

OA: C

Dear GMATGuru,

Can you shed light on how to answer such question in logical flow type?

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:00 am
Mo2men wrote:Psychologist: In a study, researchers gave 100 volunteers a psychological questionnaire designed to measure their self-esteem. The researchers then asked each volunteer to rate the strength of his or her own social skills. The volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem consistently rated themselves as having much better social skills than did the volunteers with moderate levels. This suggests that attaining an exceptionally high level of self-esteem greatly improves one's social skills.

The psychologist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which of the following grounds?

A. It fails to adequately address the possibility that many of the volunteers may not have understood what the psychological questionnaire was designed to measure.

B. It takes for granted that the volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem had better social skills than did the other volunteers, even before the former volunteers had attained their high levels of self-esteem.

C. It overlooks the possibility that people with very high levels of self-esteem may tend to have a less accurate perception of the strength of their own social skills than do people with moderate levels of self-esteem.

D. It relies on evidence from a group of volunteers that is too small to provide any support for any inferences regarding people in general.

E. It overlooks the possibility that factors other than level of self-esteem may be of much greater importance in determining the strength of one's social skills.
Premise:
Volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem consistently rated themselves as having much better social skills than did the volunteers with moderate levels.
Conclusion:
Attaining an exceptionally high level of self-esteem greatly improves one's social skills.

The correct answer must describe a FLAW -- a logical error that could serve to WEAKEN the conclusion.

It overlooks the possibility that X implies that X would WEAKEN the conclusion.
C: It overlooks the possibility that people with very high levels of self-esteem may tend to have a less accurate perception of the strength of their own social skills than do people with moderate levels of self-esteem.
The statement in green implies the following:
The volunteers in the study who had high self-esteem and rated themselves as having better social skills may not have accurately perceived the strength of their own social skills.
In other words, these volunteers may not actually HAVE better social skills, WEAKENING the conclusion that a high level of self-esteem can improve one's social skills.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:04 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Mo2men wrote:Psychologist: In a study, researchers gave 100 volunteers a psychological questionnaire designed to measure their self-esteem. The researchers then asked each volunteer to rate the strength of his or her own social skills. The volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem consistently rated themselves as having much better social skills than did the volunteers with moderate levels. This suggests that attaining an exceptionally high level of self-esteem greatly improves one's social skills.

The psychologist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which of the following grounds?

A. It fails to adequately address the possibility that many of the volunteers may not have understood what the psychological questionnaire was designed to measure.

B. It takes for granted that the volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem had better social skills than did the other volunteers, even before the former volunteers had attained their high levels of self-esteem.

C. It overlooks the possibility that people with very high levels of self-esteem may tend to have a less accurate perception of the strength of their own social skills than do people with moderate levels of self-esteem.

D. It relies on evidence from a group of volunteers that is too small to provide any support for any inferences regarding people in general.

E. It overlooks the possibility that factors other than level of self-esteem may be of much greater importance in determining the strength of one's social skills.
Premise:
Volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem consistently rated themselves as having much better social skills than did the volunteers with moderate levels.
Conclusion:
Attaining an exceptionally high level of self-esteem greatly improves one's social skills.

The correct answer must describe a FLAW -- a logical error that could serve to WEAKEN the conclusion.

It overlooks the possibility that X implies that X would WEAKEN the conclusion.
C: It overlooks the possibility that people with very high levels of self-esteem may tend to have a less accurate perception of the strength of their own social skills than do people with moderate levels of self-esteem.
The statement in green implies the following:
The volunteers in the study who had high self-esteem and rated themselves as having better social skills may not have accurately perceived the strength of their own social skills.
In other words, these volunteers may not actually HAVE better social skills, WEAKENING the conclusion that a high level of self-esteem can improve one's social skills.

The correct answer is C.
Can you shed light on why B is wrong?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:02 am
Mo2men wrote:Can you shed light on why B is wrong?
It takes for granted that X implies that X is an ASSUMPTION: a statement that must be true for the conclusion to hold.
Thus, when X is negated, the conclusion must be invalidated.
B: It takes for granted that the volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem had better social skills than did the other volunteers, even before the former volunteers had attained their high levels of self-esteem.
If we negate the statement in red, we get:
The volunteers with the highest levels of self-esteem did not have better social skills...before they attained their high levels of self-esteem.
Implication:
The better social skills were developed AFTER the volunteers attained their high levels of self-esteem, STRENGTHENING the conclusion that attaining an exceptionally high level of self-esteem greatly improves one's social skills.
Since the negation of the red statement does not invalidate the conclusion, eliminate B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion