Reading Comprehension

Line After evidence was obtained in the 1920s that
the universe is expanding, it became reasonable
to ask: Will the universe continue to expand
indefinitely, or is there enough mass in it for the
(5) mutual attraction of its constituents to bring this
expansion to a halt? It can be calculated that
the critical density of matter needed to brake the
expansion and "close" the universe is equivalent
to three hydrogen atoms per cubic meter. But the
(10) density of the observable universe-luminous matter
in the form of galaxies-comes to only a fraction
of this. If the expansion of the universe is to stop,
there must be enough invisible matter in the
universe to exceed the luminous matter in density
(15) by a factor of roughly 70.
Our contribution to the search for this "missing
matter" has been to study the rotational velocity
of galaxies at various distances from their center
of rotation. It has been known for some time that
(20) outside the bright nucleus of a typical spiral galaxy
luminosity falls off rapidly with distance from the
center. If luminosity were a true indicator of mass,
most of the mass would be concentrated toward
the center. Outside the nucleus the rotational
(25) velocitywould decrease geometricallywith distance
from the center, in conformity with Kepler's law.
Instead we have found that the rotational velocity
in spiral galaxies either remains constant with
increasing distance from the center or increases
(30) slightly. This unexpected result indicates that the
falloff in luminous mass with distance from the
center is balanced by an increase in nonluminous
mass.
Ourfindings suggest that as much as 90
(35) percent of the mass of the universe is not radiating
at any wavelength with enough intensity to be
detected on the Earth. Such dark matter could be
in the form of extremely dim stars of low mass,
of large planets like Jupiter, or of black holes,
(40) either small or massive. While it has not yet been
determined whether this mass is sufficient to
close the universe, some physicists consider it
significant that estimates are converging on the
critical value.

117. The authors' suggestion that "as much as 90 percent
of the mass of the universe is not radiating at any
wavelength with enough intensity to be detected on
the Earth" (lines 34-37) would be most weakened if
which of the following were discovered to be true?

(A) Spiral galaxies are less common than types of
galaxies that contain little nonluminous matter.

(B) Luminous and nonluminous matter are
composed of the same basic elements.

(C) The bright nucleus of a typical spiral galaxy also
contains some nonluminous matter.

(D) The density of the observable universe is
greater than most previous estimates have
suggested.

(E) Some galaxies do not rotate or rotate too slowly
for their rotational velocity to be measured.

Thanks for the breakdown Ceilidh. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this question seems oddly like a critical reasoning question? We need to find the assumption, then pick the option that undercuts it. How often are CR like questions in RC?