OG Qs. About "absolute phrase"

Expert replies

rx_11: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 87; Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:31 am; Thanked: 7 times; GMAT Score:690

by rx_11 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:00 am

Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

OA is E

Hi, all.

Try this one plz. Is the "each targeted specifically at" a "absolute phrase"? If it is, I wonder why it uses "targeted", not "targeting" ? I think "target" should be used in a active voice, not passive voice. Anyone correct me?

Stacey's big fan.

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction | Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:00 am

Tani: Legendary Member; Posts: 1255; Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pmFollowed by: 90 members; Location: St. Louis; Thanked: 312 times

by Tani » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:44 am

The first issue in this problem is "each" versus "all". By using "all" you would imply that all of the antibodies were targeting the same microbe or foreign substance. "Each" allows the individual antibodies to have separate targets. Eliminate C and D.

The second issue is "targeted to" versus "targeted at". The latter is idiomatically correct. Eliminate B.

The third issue is the placement of "specifically". The original implies that it is the targeting that is specific, when in fact the antibody is directed at a specific invader. Eliminate A - E wins.

Tani Wolff

Like this post

rx_11: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 87; Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:31 am; Thanked: 7 times; GMAT Score:690

by rx_11 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:53 am

Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:The first issue in this problem is "each" versus "all". By using "all" you would imply that all of the antibodies were targeting the same microbe or foreign substance. "Each" allows the individual antibodies to have separate targets. Eliminate C and D.

The second issue is "targeted to" versus "targeted at". The latter is idiomatically correct. Eliminate B.

The third issue is the placement of "specifically". The original implies that it is the targeting that is specific, when in fact the antibody is directed at a specific invader. Eliminate A - E wins.

Thanks very much, Tani

But would you explain why we use "targeted" in E, not "targeting"?

Moreover, is "each targeted specifically at......" an absolute phrase?

Regards.

Rx

Stacey's big fan.

Like this post

ov25: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 201; Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:23 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 7 times

by ov25 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:27 am

But would you explain why we use "targeted" in E, not "targeting"?

my answer would be that using 'targeting' might illogically modify Towengo the NP winner.

Moreover, is "each targeted specifically at......" an absolute phrase?

I dont know what you mean by 'absolute phrase'. If you meant that it is not a relative phrase, then NO. It is a relative clause modifying antibodies.

Like this post

rx_11: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 87; Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:31 am; Thanked: 7 times; GMAT Score:690

by rx_11 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:14 pm

Hi, ov25

I don't think it is a relative clause. It should be a "absolute phrase", which is a modifier that attaches to a sentence or a noun, with no conjunction and contains no verb.

Stacey's big fan.

Like this post

mithilesh.vnit85: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 21; Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 9:26 amFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 7 times

by mithilesh.vnit85 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:38 am

In this case, I think Option A,B and C can be eliminated as "seeming" is modifying "unlimited". An Adjective can never modify another adjective. Hence, we need an adverb here. Thus, we need seemingly. In between option D and E, D is illogical as "all of them targeted specifically to " implies all targeted at single foreign substance.Further, targeted at is preferred over targeted to. Hence option E.

Like this post

uwhusky: Legendary Member; Posts: 1172; Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pmFollowed by: 4 members; Thanked: 74 times

by uwhusky » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:49 am

rx_11 wrote: Try this one plz. Is the "each targeted specifically at" a "absolute phrase"? If it is, I wonder why it uses "targeted", not "targeting" ? I think "target" should be used in a active voice, not passive voice. Anyone correct me?

I don't think you fully understood active and passive sentence construction. An active/passive sentence must have a transitive verb, and in this case, an absolute "phrase" by definition does not contain a verb and therefore is not a sentence.

In addition, we should concentrate on the choices available, not how we could make the sentence better.

Yep.

Like this post

sachin_yadav: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 212; Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 amFollowed by: 1 member; Location: India; Thanked: 5 times

by sachin_yadav » Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:50 pm

Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:The first issue in this problem is "each" versus "all". By using "all" you would imply that all of the antibodies were targeting the same microbe or foreign substance. "Each" allows the individual antibodies to have separate targets.

Hi All,

After reading all the options the best answer is E, but if the options are:-

seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all targeted specifically at

or

seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically at

then which one is the best option. Some say if "all of them" exists then second one is correct.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/dr-tonegawa- ... 53447.html

Can anyone please put some light on this small topic ?

Thanks
Sachin

Like this post

Tani: Legendary Member; Posts: 1255; Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pmFollowed by: 90 members; Location: St. Louis; Thanked: 312 times

by Tani » Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:08 am

"all of them" is not incorrect, but it is wordy. I would not expect the test to ask you to chose between those alternatives.

Tani Wolff

Like this post

sachin_yadav: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 212; Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 amFollowed by: 1 member; Location: India; Thanked: 5 times

by sachin_yadav » Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:55 am

Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:"all of them" is not incorrect, but it is wordy. I would not expect the test to ask you to chose between those alternatives.

Thank you so much Tani. I really appreciate for your reply.

Regards
Sachin

Like this post

Post new topic Locked

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

560 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review