OG Extra Math review book

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: NYC, NY
Thanked: 2 times

OG Extra Math review book

by preciousrain7 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:25 pm
if k and n are integers, is n divisible by 7?

1. n-3=2k
2. 2k-4 is divisible by 7

thank you in advance for your help

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 10:29 am
Thanked: 25 times

by tmmyc » Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:09 pm
Statement 1:
n-3=2k
-> n=2k+3

if k = 2, n = 7 YES
if k = 3, n = 9 NO

Insufficient

Statement 2:
2k-4 is divisible by 7

Insufficient since we don't learn anything about n.

Together:
n=2k+3 and 2k-4 is divisible by 7

Now see that when we add 7 to 2k-4, we get 2k+3.
So 2k-4, which is divisible by 7, plus 7, which will also be divisible by 7, is 2k+3.

Since n = 2k+3, it will be divisible by 7.

Sufficient.

(Example: If 2k-4 = 14, then 2k+3=21 and both are divisible by 7.)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: NYC, NY
Thanked: 2 times

by preciousrain7 » Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:27 am
tmmyc wrote:Statement 1:


Now see that when we add 7 to 2k-4, we get 2k+3.
So 2k-4, which is divisible by 7, plus 7, which will also be divisible by 7, is 2k+3.

Since n = 2k+3, it will be divisible by 7.

Sufficient.

(Example: If 2k-4 = 14, then 2k+3=21 and both are divisible by 7.)
THANK YOU! I finally understand the way you explained it! The book had similar explanation but I couldn't figure out what they were trying to say.

Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:48 pm
We know that individually each is insufficient.

Consider both statements.

n = 2k + 3 --------- (1)

2k - 4 is divisible by 7

2k - 4 = 7a (for some integer a)

=> 2k = 7a +4 ------------------(2)

substitute 2 in 1
n = 7a +4 +3
n= 7a +7
n = 7(a+1) a+1 is another integer say b.
n = 7b

This implies n is divisible by 7. So C.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:22 am
IMO C:

n= 2k + 3
n= 5 , 7, 11,

Not suff

2. 2k-4 = n
n = 0, 2, 4, ..

Not suff


But from 1 and 2

n = 7( m+1)

Hence n multiple of 7
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856