BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 2016 DS #117

Expert replies
by Poisson » Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:14 pm
If X is negative, is X < -3?

My note: This is a yes/no question. X can be anything negative.

1. X^2 > 9

I took the square root of both sides and got X > +/-3
Since X is negative, the first option (X > +3) is out.

Why is the second option (x > -3) wrong? Why is it not X > -3? I don't understand how the results are x>3 or x < -3. I didn't divide or multiply both sides by a negative number, so I don't understand why the sign changes from X > - 3 to X < -3. Please help me understand this concept. Should I not square both sides here?

Thanks very much.


EDIT: I think I got it. Drawing a number line helps. I tested -4 and it it makes sense and I see it now. I X would be LESS than -3.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Sun Aug 21, 2016 5:46 pm
Hi Poisson,

When you're dealing with X^2 > 9, then there are two 'groups' of numbers that fit this information:

X > 3
X < -3

If you don't clearly see why, then you can always come up with a couple of quick examples to prove the math: 4^2 = 16 and (-4)^2 = 16. Since both of those values are greater than 9, both have to be accounted for by the work that you do. 4 > 3 and -4 < -3. Now, just swap out the 4 and -4 for X.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion