BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 10-Hundred Years

Expert replies
by rahulg83 » Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:45 am
For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 1788, England exiled some 160,000 criminals to
Australia.

(A) For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 1788,
(B) Beginning in 1788 for a period of a hundred years,
(C) Beginning a period of almost a hundred years, in 1788
(D) During a hundred years, a period beginning in 1788,
(E) Over a period of a hundred years beginning in 1788,

I was able to narrow down choices b/w D and E, but somehow thought D is correct. But the solution says that D is illogical. Can someone explain why this is so? The reason mentioned was the following:

Choice D is awkward and unidiomatic, and nonsensically suggests that a hundred years is defined as a period beginning in 1788

I really could not understand this logic..maybe it's very simple and i am missing something here. :?: :?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sidtiwari » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:01 am
yes choice E is right as D uses a modifier phrase. So the noun here is described by the modifier phrase which does not make sense. But choice E is clear and makes sense. I hope that clears your doubt
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:15 am
Good question. I also was able to narrow down the options to D and E. However, got confused between them. Finally, I select E, simply, because placing "a period beginning in 1788" between commas makes it non-essential information. Hence, select E.

However, I couldn't able to figure out what is "unidiomatic" and "nonsensically" in option D.

Someone plz explain...
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:50 am
D) During a hundred years, a period beginning in 1788, England exiled some 160,000 criminals to Australia.


The information within commas "a period beginning in 1788" modifies "a 100 years"= this seems like a hundred years is a period begining in 1788 only or any set of years begining in 1788 is called a hundred years. this makes it nonsensical.

Also, when we use "during" we need a definite time frame. the use of "a hundred years" makes it very general and not meaningful. "period begining 1788 is made non essential to the sentence by setting it off within commas.
so "during a hundred years" is not idiomatic. "During the last 100 years would have been better'
Join the discussion

by uymba » Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:18 am
Sorry to make you "go back". But why is that you discarded choice B?

It seemed OK for to say that England exiled many people beginning in X year for a period of time.
I ´m missing something, no doubt about it :)

Thank you.
=============
Go for 700+!!
https://mbajourney12.blocked/
Join the discussion

by quocbao » Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:24 am
I think B changes the meaning of the sentence

Beginning in 1788 for a period of a hundred years, England exiled some 160,000 criminals to Australia.

=> Eng exiled criminals to Aus at the beginning of 1788

while the actually meaning is around 1888 ( 1788 + 100 )
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:54 am
uymba wrote:Sorry to make you "go back". But why is that you discarded choice B?

It seemed OK for to say that England exiled many people beginning in X year for a period of time.
I ´m missing something, no doubt about it :)

Thank you.

option B: begining in 1788 modifies England. it seems to say begining in 1788, England exiled....which is awkward. it seems as if England began in 1788.
Join the discussion

by uymba » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:44 am
Understood. You are saying then that the clause (beginning ...) modifies the noun (England), not the verb (exiled).
Is it always like that? or the rule applies just to this particular case? how can i be aware?
Thanks!
=============
Go for 700+!!
https://mbajourney12.blocked/
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:32 am
B: "begining in 1788 for a period of 100 years" is participial phrase. a partciple is a verbal adjective. "begining" is a verb form here which does the work of an adjective. an adjective always modifies the noun, never a verb.
so begining in 1788 modifies the noun "England"
Join the discussion

by uymba » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:18 am
ok. Sorry to insist. Just to get it really straight.
The purpose of the modifier is to modify the verb, but the construction (that begins with a verb in ing (begining) is that of a modifier that modifies nouns.

Is that a correct paraphrasing of your answer?

Thanks a lot!
=============
Go for 700+!!
https://mbajourney12.blocked/
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:21 pm
in this case the "ing" modifier is modifying the wrong noun- England.
would have been better if it said " Begining in 1788, deportation of criminals from E to A continued for ....years". ing form would have modified the noun" deportation"

ing modifiers can modify an action also
eg. I walked, whistling away merrily. here "whistling away..." ing phrase modifies the action: how i walked. it modifies the clause "I walked"

depends on the meaning of the sentences.
not aware of a rule about "ing modifiers in the begining".. will have to checkup.
Join the discussion

by uymba » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:44 pm
I see... I´ll be thinking that next time.
good explanation though :D
thank you very much!
=============
Go for 700+!!
https://mbajourney12.blocked/
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1