BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Of the 60 families in a certain neighborhood

Expert replies
by Soumita Ghosh » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:59 am
Of the 60 families in a certain neighborhood, 38 have a cat. How many of the families in this neighborhood have a dog?

(1) 28 of the families in this neighborhood have a cat but not a dog
(2) The number of families in the neighborhood who have a dog and a cat is the same as the number of families who have neither a cat nor a dog.

OA B

I have found that statement 1 alone is insufficient.

I am facing problem regarding calculation in statement B even though I know that statement 2 alone is sufficient.

Kindly see my calculation thoroughly and let me know where I am doing mistake.

I have solved this in matrix form.

Please find the attachment

I found the number of the families in this neighborhood have a dog which is 22(highlighted in yellow)through this way. So I found statement 2 is sufficient.


When I am calculating this below way I also able to find the answer:

D = no of the families have a dog.

60 = 38+D-X+X
or, D = 22.

But my problem is when I am solving this below way I am not able to solve X.

60 = 38-X+X+X+22-X (refer my above matrix in order to find how I got this expression)

Then I do not know how to solve.

I know I am doing here some mistake. Please point out my mistake in this calculation.
Attachments
matrix.docx
Please find the attachment
(12.6 KiB) Downloaded 126 times
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:04 pm
Your use of the matrix was perfect here, and it allowed you to get to the right answer. Why are you also trying to solve algebraically? There's no need to solve twice!

If I understand what you're saying, you're able to solve for D (number of dogs) algebraically, but that you're not able to solve for X. But why are you trying to solve for X? The question is asking about the number of dogs, so finding D is sufficient. It doesn't matter what X is at all. In fact, consider these scenarios:

Here's one possible solution for X:

Image


But here's another scenario that also works:

Image


Statement 2 is not sufficient to solve for X, but who cares?! It's sufficient to solve for D, and that's all we need.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion