Numebr line
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
- Thanked: 26 times
Please find attachment. What is the best way to solve this problem? It was not difficult but was not very easy as well
- Attachments
-
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask
Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:45 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
I would say that answer is A
statement 1 states that q=-s thus q <0>0. it means that 0 is included into the (q;s) distance and is located strictly in the middle.
r being also inside (q;s), r is closest to 0 because distance (r;0) or (0;r) is smaller than (-s;0) or (0;s).
statement 2 does not provide enough info. Zero could be anywhere inside (q;t) or even before q (i.e. q, r, s, t are all positive numbers).
statement 1 states that q=-s thus q <0>0. it means that 0 is included into the (q;s) distance and is located strictly in the middle.
r being also inside (q;s), r is closest to 0 because distance (r;0) or (0;r) is smaller than (-s;0) or (0;s).
statement 2 does not provide enough info. Zero could be anywhere inside (q;t) or even before q (i.e. q, r, s, t are all positive numbers).