BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number Theory

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vineeshp » Tue May 17, 2011 4:25 am
I'd go with E here.

Y X Z
3 4 7
3 4 8
3 -1 2
3 -1 3

In all these cases, Y is not equal to X + Z.
But in 1st and 3rd, |X| = Y-Z.

So N.S

Adding stmt 2 to Stmt 1 takes away 1st and 2nd set of values. But other 2 still remain.
So E.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)
Join the discussion

by champmag » Tue May 17, 2011 11:07 am
+ 1 for E.

both the statements are not sufficient to answer the question.
Join the discussion

by uslalas22 » Tue May 17, 2011 1:20 pm
I initially thought the answer would be A, but maybe I am falling into a trap here.

Vineeshp, you note the example y=3 and z=7, and x=4. And you state Y is not equal to X + Z and |X| = Y-Z. However wouldn't Y-Z = 3-4 = -4. If x = 4, |X| = 4. 4 does not equal -4. I point this out because I think we can say that given statement one, the stimulus can't be true.

Since statement 1 says X+Z is not equal Y, it tells us X is definitely negative, (or simply any arbitrary number.) I would say it tells us sufficiently that the answer to the stimulus is no. I don't see how statement 1 can tell us in any way that the stimulus holds true.

Thoughts?
Join the discussion

by djiddish98 » Wed May 18, 2011 5:57 pm
I also like A.

If |X| = Y - Z, then y > z, since the answer has to be positive (or y = z and x = 0)

x = y - z when x is positive
-x = z - y when x is negative

both cases let us know that x + z = y when we rearrange terms. Since statement 1 tells us that x + z != y, then we know that |X| != Y - Z, which is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed May 18, 2011 8:31 pm
I received a PM asking for comment.
uslalas22 wrote: Since statement 1 says X+Z is not equal Y, it tells us X is definitely negative, (or simply any arbitrary number.)
Your line of reasoning here wasn't entirely clear to me, but Statement 1 does not guarantee that X is negative - X+Z can be different from Y when X is positive as well. It is, however, true that we always get a 'no' answer to the question when X is positive (I go into more detail below), so if we want to get a 'yes' answer to the question, we'll need to look at negative values of x.
djiddish98 wrote:

If |X| = Y - Z, then y > z, since the answer has to be positive (or y = z and x = 0)

x = y - z when x is positive
-x = z - y when x is negative

both cases let us know that x + z = y when we rearrange terms. Since statement 1 tells us that x + z != y, then we know that |X| != Y - Z, which is sufficient.
There's a problem with your math here, which I've highlighted in red. If you are considering the case when X is negative, and you have the equation |X| = Y-X, then since X is negative you can replace |X| with -X. But you certainly should not replace Y-Z with Z-Y; Y-Z is still equal to Y-Z. That is, you should not apply a negative sign to both sides of the equation, as you did above; those will always just cancel each other out no matter what equation you look at. You want only to replace |X| with -X, nothing more. If it's not clear why that's the case, imagine a simpler equation: |x| = 3. When you want to find the negative solution for x, when you are getting rid of the absolute value brackets you don't put a negative sign on both sides of the equation - you only put a negative on the left side.

sourabh33 wrote:Is |X| = Y-Z ?

1. X+Z is not equal Y
2. X<0
If, from Statement 1, X+Z is not equal to Y, then certainly X is not equal to Y-Z. If X is not equal to Y-Z, and if X is positive, then |X| will also not equal Y-Z, so if X is positive, the answer to the question is 'no'. But we need to consider the possibility that X is negative as well - this is how we might get a 'yes' answer to the question. If, say, X = -1, Y = 2 and Z = 1, then Statement 1 is true (X+Z is not equal to Y) and |X| = Y-Z is also true - we can get a 'yes' answer to the question as well. The answer is E here, since it's also possible to get a 'no' answer when X is negative (just use the same numbers as before but let X be -10, say).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by djiddish98 » Thu May 19, 2011 4:04 am
Thanks for taking the time to correct my error, Ian. Absolute Values always trip me up.
Join the discussion