Not all employment selection

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:00 am
Thanked: 2 times

Not all employment selection

by figs » Sat May 16, 2009 1:34 am
Not all employment selection mechanisms that have a "disparate effect," that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to their presence in the relevant labor market, are unlawful.

A.that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to

B.which means, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with

C.which means, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with

D.that is, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to

E.that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with


Can anybody explain what screen is referring?? i'm not able to know if must be singular or plural??

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740

by 2010gmat » Sat May 16, 2009 1:37 am
IMO it should agree with Mechanisms ...

I select D

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Not all employment selection

by iamcste » Sat May 16, 2009 1:58 am
figs wrote: Can anybody explain what screen is referring?? i'm not able to know if must be singular or plural??
we have only single subject here....selection mechanisms

yes, at first it is not clear

ask yourself what in sentence can screen / select out...selection mechanims? makes senses...yes, so thats the subject...


whats the source ?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:52 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by sudeep_ar » Sat May 16, 2009 9:06 pm
IMO...D

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:51 am
Thanked: 1 times

by rseeker2 » Sun May 17, 2009 1:46 am
IMO,

that which falls in between the commas is describing the 'disparate effect'. Hence A and E would remain. I feel 'disproportionate with' is idiomatic. Hence would choose A.
Last edited by rseeker2 on Sun May 17, 2009 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Not all employment selection

by Vemuri » Sun May 17, 2009 3:36 am
IMO D

"disproportionate with" is unidiomatic. That leaves us with A & D.

"employment selection mechanisms" is plural, so we require a plural verb "screen" rather than "screens". Hence D

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 4:31 am
Location: Gurgoan
GMAT Score:700

by adroit.gmat » Sun May 17, 2009 10:22 am
Figure out the subject of the second clause..?


the second that acts as a pronoun , as there is no other subject and it's singular, as it is not those ..
hence all choices with that screen is out (C,D)

disproportionate with / to - with is used with a another(/other?) no. it would be correct in case of..
a percentage disproportionate with the no of / the percentage of etc

here it is their presence in the relevant labor market, X screens out Y disproportionate to Z
hence B& E are out .. IMO A ..

Pls give out the OA as all my explanation goes for a toss..;) and the source to..
Never say die

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:34 am
Thanked: 305 times
Followed by:55 members
GMAT Score:760

by myohmy » Sun May 17, 2009 11:19 am
IMO, D.

The subject here is "selection mechanisms" not "disparate effect" so the "that" is referring to the "selection mechanisms" which is plural.

"Selection mechanisms ... screen out"


Therefore, we're looking for "screen" not "screens," which eliminates A, B, and E.

"Disproportionate to" is the correct idiom, so D would be my answer choice.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Sun May 17, 2009 5:24 pm
I'm with @myohmy

IMO - D

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:00 am
Thanked: 2 times

by figs » Mon May 18, 2009 8:58 am
OA:D