Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Mourdet Winery

Expert replies
by massi2884 » Tue May 01, 2012 10:19 am
Can you explain why it's not A? If the background color is gold isn't the label undistinguishable? Thanks OA D

Mourdet Winery: Danville Winery's new wine was introduced to compete with our most popular wine, which is sold in a distinctive tall, black bottle. Danville uses a similar bottle. Thus, it is likely that many customers intending to buy our wine will mistakenly buy theirs instead.

Danville Winery: Not so. The two bottles can be readily distinguished: the label on ours, but not on theirs, is gold colored.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines Danville Winery's response?

(A) Gold is the background color on the label of many of the wines produced by Danville Winery.

(B) When the bottles are viewed side by side, Danville Winery's bottle is perceptibly taller than Mourdet Winery's.

(C) Danville Winery, unlike Mourdet Winery, displays its wine's label prominently in advertisements.

(D) It is common for occasional purchasers to buy a bottle of wine on the basis of a general impression of the most obvious feature of the bottle.

(E) Many popular wines are sold in bottles of a standard design.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vk_vinayak » Tue May 01, 2012 11:11 am
I will go with D.

If the background color is gold isn't the label undistinguishable?
>> First of all A says that 'many of the wines produced by Danville Winery', not all, have gold couloured background. This label may make many of the Danville Winery's bottles indistinguishable among themselves.

I understand your doubt. If someone is a hardcore fan of either Mourdet or Danville (or both), he (she) can readily distinguish the bottle. But even if few customers fail to distinguish the bottles solely on the label color, then Danville's argument falls apart.

Mourdet Winery is talking in terms of height and bottle colour, and Danville is responding in terms of label colour. The option D, which says that (irrespective of the label color), the bottle can be mistaken on the basis of most obvious feature of the bottle. It is directly attacking the Danville's response, hence better.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Join the discussion

by ice_rush » Tue May 01, 2012 11:15 am
I can see why (A) cannot be the answer, but even (D) is not that great an answer.

In order to weaken the argument, we have to show that the two bottles cannot be readily distinguished.

Choice (A) talks about only the label on the wine bottles of Danville Winery. It does not mention anything about Mourdet Winery's wine bottles. This choice is out of scope.

My only contention with choice (D) is the word "occasional" purchasers, whereas the conclusion in the first stem is that...it is likely that many customers intending to buy our wine.

What's the source of this problem?
Join the discussion

by massi2884 » Wed May 02, 2012 5:44 am
It's GMATPrep.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Oct 14, 2016 10:14 am
Hi Experts,

Any idea what category would E fall into?

Is it irrelevant because we have no info if DW is popular or is it a weakener since M W is popular and hence sold in a standard bottle then there are chances that people will confuse it with other popular bottles. Please suggest?
Join the discussion

by crackverbal » Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:47 am
The argument of MW (Mourdet Winery) is this -

DW (Danville Winery) uses a similar bottle --> Many customers will buy DW wine.

DW states that bottles can be readily distinguished because it uses gold colored labels.

DW tries to weaken MW's argument by giving a consideration that states that the effect mentioned above(many customers will buy DW wine) might not happen.
We have to weaken DW's argument. Any option that states that many customers will buy DW wine because of similarly shaped bottles is the correct answer.

A - strengthens DW's argument. Customers might be able to distinguish MW's wine from DW's wine because many people might associate DW's wines with gold colored labels.

B - strengthens DW's argument. If DW's wine bottle is perceptibly taller then people might be able distinguish MW's wine bottle from DW's wine bottle.

C - strengthens DW's argument. If it does that then probably people can easily distinguish MW's wine from DW's wine.

D - correct answer. It suggests that "occasional purchasers" will probably buy DW's wine thinking that it is MW's wine. Here obvious feature = tall distinctive black bottle.

E - not relevant. The argument is not talking about standard design, but about tall, distinctive black bottle.
Join Free 4 part MBA Through GMAT Video Training Series here -
https://gmat.crackverbal.com/mba-throug ... video-2018

Enroll for our GMAT Trial Course here -
https://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/

For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal
Join the discussion