more televisions than people

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

more televisions than people

by imskpwr » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:22 am
For the first time in history, more televisions than people can be found in American households. According to recent research, the average household has 2.55 residents and contains 2.73 televisions. However, by employing such costly manufacturing processes as plasma technology and flat screens, televisions are becoming too expensive for the typical consumer. As a result, the average number of residents per household will again surpass the number of televisions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

House parties at which numerous individuals gather to view popular television shows on one television set have increased three hundred percent during the past year.

More than one million legal immigrants enter the United States each year.

New devices such as video-enabled personal digital assistants and music players are increasingly purchased for use as a primary source of information and entertainment.

As new technologies become more commonplace, manufacturing and retail costs normally decline.

As a result of technological advances, new televisions are increasingly enabled with some features, such as Internet browsing, traditionally associated with other household devices.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:56 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by swg » Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:24 am
IMO, the ans should be B.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Jul 14, 2012 7:09 am
A) Irrelevant
B) This requires us to know far too much about people who legally immigrate to the US. Do legal immigrants own a lot of televisions or do that own very few televisions? This answer choice could strengthen or weaken the conclusion. I'll eliminate it because a true GMAT question would not rely on one's knowledge of the demographics of the immigrants of a country.
C) This suggests that people are turning to different technologies to watch video content (which used to be the sole domain of TVs). If people turn to different technologies, then TV's may drop in popularity. Looks good.
D) Cheaper TVs would suggest that people buy more of them. This weakens the argument.
E) This suggests that TVs will become increasingly popular, in which case people will buy more of them. This weakens the argument.

It would seem that the best answer is C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by imskpwr » Sat Jul 14, 2012 10:18 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:A) Irrelevant
B) This requires us to know far too much about people who legally immigrate to the US. Do legal immigrants own a lot of televisions or do that own very few televisions? This answer choice could strengthen or weaken the conclusion. I'll eliminate it because a true GMAT question would not rely on one's knowledge of the demographics of the immigrants of a country.
C) This suggests that people are turning to different technologies to watch video content (which used to be the sole domain of TVs). If people turn to different technologies, then TV's may drop in popularity. Looks good.
D) Cheaper TVs would suggest that people buy more of them. This weakens the argument.
E) This suggests that TVs will become increasingly popular, in which case people will buy more of them. This weakens the argument.

It would seem that the best answer is C

Cheers,
Brent
Thanks!
Indeed the correct answer is C.
But how would one defines the scope in this argument? i thought C and E were out of scope.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Jul 14, 2012 10:36 am
imskpwr wrote: Thanks!
Indeed the correct answer is C.
But how would one defines the scope in this argument? i thought C and E were out of scope.
We're looking for a premise that supports the conclusion that people will buy fewer TVs in the future. Anything that accomplishes this should be considered.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 8:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by mmeital » Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:54 pm
Just a general question:
How do I generate the black box that highlights the answer once you move the mouse pointer over it?

Thanks!

Matan

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:04 am
mmeital wrote:Just a general question:
How do I generate the black box that highlights the answer once you move the mouse pointer over it?

Thanks!

Matan
Hi Matan,

To generate the black box:
1) Highlight the text you want to hide
2) Click the "Spoiler" button

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 8:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by mmeital » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:25 am
[spoiler]Thanks![/spoiler]