BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Modifier

Expert replies
by Onell » Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:00 pm
1.Before scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly in small amounts from the pituitary glands of human cadavers.
A. scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly
B. scientists had learned about making a synthetic growth hormone, they had to remove it painstakingly
C. scientist learned how to synthesize the growth hormone, it had to be painstakingly removed
D. learning how to make a synthetic growth hormone, scientists had to remove it painstakingly
E. Learning how to synthesize the growth hormone, it have to be painstakingly removed by scientists.

OA c . But in og 12 sc 9 ,

2.Delighted by the reported earnings for the first quarter of the fiscal year, it was decided by the company manager to give her staff a raise.

(A) it was decided by the company manager to give her staff a raise
(B) the decision of the company manager was to give her staff a raise
(C) the company manager decided to give her staff a raise
(D) the staff was given a raise by the company manager
(E) a raise was given to the staff by the company manager

OA c.

For the original sentence 2 OG says The modifier illogically describes it. Shouldn't the same be applied to the sentence 1 (oa c) as well? Please elaborate.

Thank you
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by saketk » Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:42 pm
The first one has more of a meaning issue. before developing the hormone synthetically, Scientists had to remove it [the growth hormone] from pituitary glands.

All other options except option C distort the meaning. For example option A says -- scientist were removing sythetic hormone from the human body. that's illogical.
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 11:05 pm
Onell wrote: For the original sentence 2 OG says The modifier illogically describes it. Shouldn't the same be applied to the sentence 1 (oa c) as well? Please elaborate.
Both the sentences are not similar in structure.

In the first sentence the structure is before X learned to do Y, Y was done in another way. The first clause doesn't modify the second clause.

Whereas in the second sentence "Delighted by the reported earnings for the first quarter of the fiscal year" this is a introductory modifier of Subject X and it is almost always wrong to mention the subject with 'it' the first time.

If the first sentence had been this way

Before learning to synthesize growth hormones, it was done by removing ...

Then you can compare. Hope you get it. The subject (scientists) should be coming in the place of 'it'

The main point is the first sentence doesn't seem to be a modifier error but just a pronoun error and is different from second sentence.

I guess i went too bad in explaining. Hope this helps :).
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1