Modifier

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:20 am
Thanked: 1 times

Modifier

by Onell » Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:00 pm
1.Before scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly in small amounts from the pituitary glands of human cadavers.
A. scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly
B. scientists had learned about making a synthetic growth hormone, they had to remove it painstakingly
C. scientist learned how to synthesize the growth hormone, it had to be painstakingly removed
D. learning how to make a synthetic growth hormone, scientists had to remove it painstakingly
E. Learning how to synthesize the growth hormone, it have to be painstakingly removed by scientists.

OA c . But in og 12 sc 9 ,

2.Delighted by the reported earnings for the first quarter of the fiscal year, it was decided by the company manager to give her staff a raise.

(A) it was decided by the company manager to give her staff a raise
(B) the decision of the company manager was to give her staff a raise
(C) the company manager decided to give her staff a raise
(D) the staff was given a raise by the company manager
(E) a raise was given to the staff by the company manager

OA c.

For the original sentence 2 OG says The modifier illogically describes it. Shouldn't the same be applied to the sentence 1 (oa c) as well? Please elaborate.

Thank you

Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

by saketk » Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:42 pm
The first one has more of a meaning issue. before developing the hormone synthetically, Scientists had to remove it [the growth hormone] from pituitary glands.

All other options except option C distort the meaning. For example option A says -- scientist were removing sythetic hormone from the human body. that's illogical.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
Thanked: 233 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 11:05 pm
Onell wrote: For the original sentence 2 OG says The modifier illogically describes it. Shouldn't the same be applied to the sentence 1 (oa c) as well? Please elaborate.
Both the sentences are not similar in structure.

In the first sentence the structure is before X learned to do Y, Y was done in another way. The first clause doesn't modify the second clause.

Whereas in the second sentence "Delighted by the reported earnings for the first quarter of the fiscal year" this is a introductory modifier of Subject X and it is almost always wrong to mention the subject with 'it' the first time.

If the first sentence had been this way

Before learning to synthesize growth hormones, it was done by removing ...

Then you can compare. Hope you get it. The subject (scientists) should be coming in the place of 'it'

The main point is the first sentence doesn't seem to be a modifier error but just a pronoun error and is different from second sentence.

I guess i went too bad in explaining. Hope this helps :).
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/