MGMT -Verb Tense- Confusion!

smackmartine wrote:This is with reference to MGMT Sentence Correction(4th Edition) - Verb Tense lesson-Page 110.

I am finding a hard time understanding this structure of a sentence that uses Past perfect tense. Please clarify:

The band U2 WAS just one of the many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, U2 HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.

Should n't we use "earlier" instead of "later" after "ten years", because the second part of the sentence talks about an earlier event?

Hi surprisingly yesterday i revised this same lesson and this same example made me think for some time and i finally develop some understanding. I'm glad u invited me in this discussion, lets see to what extent m correct.

The band U2 WAS just one of the many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, U2 HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.

U have no problem in the part in green, but have some issues with the blue part right.

Should n't we use "earlier" instead of "later" after "ten years", because the second part of the sentence talks about an earlier event?

if u notice, the complete thing is "less than ten years later"....in relation to the first part the timeline will be like this

-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------
<--in early 1980's <-------- less than 10 years later-------------> ten years later------>

Now, watch out this part carefully,

less than ten years later, U2 HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.

here u are fixing a point on the year which comes ten years later and the use of less than signifies that u are talking about something that happened before that fixed year, so whatever happened before that fixed year takes past perfect and thats why had eclipsed.

This sentence is somewhat similar to that same example

By the end of 1990, i had become the petroleum minister in US.

If u relate "By the end of 1990" to "less than ten years later"....both are somewhere functioning in the same way...just read again m sure u will understand the concept for sure.

Hope this help!!!

Hi surprisingly yesterday i revised this same lesson and this same example made me think for some time and i finally develop some understanding. I'm glad u invited me in this discussion, lets see to what extent m correct.

The band U2 WAS just one of the many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, U2 HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.

U have no problem in the part in green, but have some issues with the blue part right.

Should n't we use "earlier" instead of "later" after "ten years", because the second part of the sentence talks about an earlier event?

if u notice, the complete thing is "less than ten years later"....in relation to the first part, the complete timeline will look like this

-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------
<--in early 1980's <-------- less than 10 years later-------------> ten years later------>

Now, watch out this part carefully,

less than ten years later, U2 HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.

here u are fixing a point on the year which comes ten years later and the use of less than signifies that u are talking about something that happened before that fixed year, so whatever happened before that fixed year takes past perfect and thats why had eclipsed.

This sentence is somewhat similar to that same example: MADE UP

By the end of 1990, i had become the petroleum minister in US.

If u relate "By the end of 1990" to "less than ten years later"....both are somewhere functioning in the same way...just read again m sure u will understand the concept for sure.

Hope this help!!!

Atul,

The time line you made is amazing.Very impressive indeed. I totally get it now. Thanks for your prompt reply.

smackmartine wrote: The band U2 WAS just one of the many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980's, but less than ten years later, U2 HAD fully ECLIPSED its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.

Should n't we use "earlier" instead of "later" after "ten years", because the second part of the sentence talks about an earlier event?

Hi,
Good work guys! Agree with the points Atul has mentioned.
I would like to add just one more thing. usage of 'earlier' changes the meaning significantly. 10 years earlier will be 10 years earlier than 1980's say, 1970s. But, the band is itself new in 1980's, so it can't dominate 10 years before its inception. So, this statement doesn't make sense in that way.

smackmartine wrote:Atual,

The time line you made is amazing.Very impressive indeed. I totally get it now. Thanks for your prompt reply.

M glad it helped brother...by the way, u made a typo error..my name is Atul...not Atual!!!

atulmangal wrote:

smackmartine wrote:Atual,

The time line you made is amazing.Very impressive indeed. I totally get it now. Thanks for your prompt reply.

M glad it helped brother...by the way, u made a typo error..my name is Atul...not Atual!!!

Sorry about that :) I will edit it right away.