BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mgmat SC

Expert replies
by adi_800 » Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:08 pm
During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to free market principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers.

A. principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers
B. principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of various government regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers
C. principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations that variously restrict worker hiring and firing
D. principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various government regulations, its functioning being stifled
E. principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

OA E
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by adi_800 » Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:13 pm
Is A wrong for not using a clause of BUT?

This is what Mgmat says about A..
The original sentence is problematic in its use of the possessive pronoun "its." The antecedent to "its" is the "labor market," which incorrectly and illogically suggests that the labor market is somehow possessing or passing government regulations itself. In addition, the original sentence incorrectly uses active rather than passive voice to describe the effects imposed on the "labor market" by government regulations, thus illogically suggesting that the "labor market" itself is stifling functioning, rather than being stifled by other forces.

Also...Did not get what mgmat wanna say for eliminating A...
Can anyone explain?
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:27 pm
Dear Adi_800,

Option (A) does not make grammatical sense to me. The choice of the words 'stifling functioning through its various government regulations' doesn't convey any sensible meaning. Hence I ruled out option (A).
Join the discussion

by puneetdua » Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:28 pm
ahh :( tuff for me , i voted for B.

For E - isn't it passive ->
its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations


Can anyone explain this question clearly.
Thanks
Puneet
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:07 am
adi_800 wrote:Is A wrong for not using a clause of BUT?

This is what Mgmat says about A..
The original sentence is problematic in its use of the possessive pronoun "its." The antecedent to "its" is the "labor market," which incorrectly and illogically suggests that the labor market is somehow possessing or passing government regulations itself. In addition, the original sentence incorrectly uses active rather than passive voice to describe the effects imposed on the "labor market" by government regulations, thus illogically suggesting that the "labor market" itself is stifling functioning, rather than being stifled by other forces.

Also...Did not get what mgmat wanna say for eliminating A...
Can anyone explain?
A has multiple issues -

1. but and instead convey the same meaning. Use of both together leads to redundancy.

2. its refers to the labor market. Replace its by the labor market and look closely at the meaning conveyed.

but instead stifling functioning through the labor market's various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers.

The meaning conveyed is that the labor market possesses various governmental regulations. This is nonsensical.

3. The use of active voice also gives a wrong meaning.

but instead stifling functioning through the labor market's various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers.

This suggests that the labor market, through various regulations, is stifling functioning. This is again nonsensical in the given context.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:17 am
puneetdua wrote:ahh :( tuff for me , i voted for B.

For E - isn't it passive ->
its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations


Can anyone explain this question clearly.
That is a very gross generality and one may pay dearly for it. We cannot rule out any construction just because it is in passive voice. Sometimes, a sentence warrants a passive construction (such as this sentence).

Note the error in B. It joins two independent clauses using a comma.

1) During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to free market principles
2) instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of various government regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers


This is a definite no-no.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1