300! is divisible by (24!)^n. what is the max. possible integral value of n?
a .13
b.12
c. 15
d.14
e.23
max. possible integral value of n
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
There u r !! Correct!liferocks wrote:greatest prime factor of 24! is 23
so number of 23 in 300! will determine the number of 24! in 300!
this is (300/23)=12
Ans option B
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:31 pm
- Thanked: 97 times
- Followed by:1 members
yup..should be 13..edited.kstv wrote:But 23 *13 = 299liferocks wrote:greatest prime factor of 24! is 23
so number of 23 in 300! will determine the number of 24! in 300!
this is (300/23)=12
Ans option B
@gmatmachoman..12 cannot be correct..should be 13..or did i got the process wrong?
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Lewis Carroll
- nikhilkatira
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:55 am
- Thanked: 12 times
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
300 will contain way more of the smaller prime factors. Thus, the number of times the greatest prime factor (of 24) can go into 300 will limit the number of times 24! can go into 300!vinay89 wrote:so number of 23 in 300! will determine the number of 24! in 300!
Dont really get why we look for the greatest prime factor?
For example, if we think about the really small prime factors of 24--the 2s and the 3s, it is clear that there are way more of them in 300. Let's think about the second biggest prime factor of 24--19. Every 19th number is a multiple of 19. But every 23rd number is a multiple of 23. So, there are fewer 23s in 300 than there are 19s. (300/19 = 15.7. Thus, there are 15 19s in 300. This doesn't mean that 24! can divide 300! 15 times, however, because there are only 13 23s in 24!. This means that 24! can't divide 300 a 14th time).
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
What if we take, for ease, the case of number of time 6! is divisible by 4!. Should we say since 3! can divide 6! twice, 4! should as well? I think one should be in doubt, if they had one more option like "not feasible to get an integral value of 'n'" or "none" or something like that. This is my first post,correct me if I am wrong.