MGMAT CAT#2 PS Question #3

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 162
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Minnesota
Thanked: 1 times

MGMAT CAT#2 PS Question #3

by EMAN » Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:05 pm
In a group of 68 students, each student is registered for at least one of three classes - History, Math and English. Twenty-five students are registered for History, twenty-five students are registered for Math, and thirty-four students are registered for English. If only three students are registered for all three classes, how many students are registered for exactly two classes?

(A) 13
(B) 10
(C) 9
(D) 8
(E) 7

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:25 am
Is the answer 9 ..that is C..
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:48 am
Location: india
Thanked: 39 times

by xcusemeplz2009 » Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:55 am
IMO B

need to draw a venn dig..

let the portion only H as a, only M as b and only E as c

let only H+M as x
only M+E as y
and only E+H as z

now a+x+z+3+b+y+c=68 or
a+b+c+x+y+z=65

and a+b+C+2(x+y+z)+9=84 or
a+b+c+2(x+y+z)=75
using bth the eqn x+y+z=10
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: MGMAT CAT#2 PS Question #3

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:10 am
EMAN wrote:In a group of 68 students, each student is registered for at least one of three classes - History, Math and English. Twenty-five students are registered for History, twenty-five students are registered for Math, and thirty-four students are registered for English. If only three students are registered for all three classes, how many students are registered for exactly two classes?

(A) 13
(B) 10
(C) 9
(D) 8
(E) 7
Venn diagrams are a great way to solve this type of question.

Another method we can use is formula-based. There are two useful formulas for 3-group overlapping set questions:

True # of objects = (total # in group 1) + (total # in group 2) + (total # in group 3) - (# in only groups 1/2) - (# in only groups 1/3) - (# in only groups 2/3) - 2(# in all 3 groups) + (# in no groups)

or, compacting the middle section:

True # of objects = (total # in group 1) + (total # in group 2) + (total # in group 3) - (# in exactly 2 groups) - 2(# in all 3 groups) + (# in no groups)

The second formula is a bit different:

True # of objects = (# in exactly 1 group) + (# in exactly 2 groups) + (# in all 3 groups) + (# in no groups)

[this is the formula that xcuseme generated from the Venn diagram].

We want to use the first formula to solve this particular question.

We know that:

True # of students = 68
Total # in history = 25
Total # in math = 25
Total # in english = 34
# in all 3 = 3
# in none = 0 (everyone is in at least 1 class)

So:

68 = 25 + 25 + 34 - (# in exactly 2 classes) - 2(3) + 0

68 = 78 - (# in exactly 2 classes)

(# in exactly 2 classes) = 10
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 162
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Minnesota
Thanked: 1 times

Thanks

by EMAN » Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:34 am
Excellent. This is extremely helpful. Can you explain the logic in the formula explanation why you have to put a coefficient of 2 in front of the 3 (number of students in all groups???

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: Thanks

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:36 am
EMAN wrote:Excellent. This is extremely helpful. Can you explain the logic in the formula explanation why you have to put a coefficient of 2 in front of the 3 (number of students in all groups???
The students in all 3 groups have been counted 3 times: once as part of group 1, once as part of group 2 and once as part of group 3.

Since we want to count each subsection only once, and since we counted the triple group 3 times, we need to subtract it twice.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:20 pm

by kumadil2011 » Fri Nov 18, 2011 6:17 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
EMAN wrote:Excellent. This is extremely helpful. Can you explain the logic in the formula explanation why you have to put a coefficient of 2 in front of the 3 (number of students in all groups???
The students in all 3 groups have been counted 3 times: once as part of group 1, once as part of group 2 and once as part of group 3.

Since we want to count each subsection only once, and since we counted the triple group 3 times, we need to subtract it twice.

Hi Stuart,

https://www.beatthegmat.com/210-bags-con ... 31800.html

Im unable to solve the problem in the link, with mentioned formula, not sure if this would apply here..

Can you please help in solving this?

Tx

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:47 am
kumadil2011 wrote:
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
EMAN wrote:Excellent. This is extremely helpful. Can you explain the logic in the formula explanation why you have to put a coefficient of 2 in front of the 3 (number of students in all groups???
The students in all 3 groups have been counted 3 times: once as part of group 1, once as part of group 2 and once as part of group 3.

Since we want to count each subsection only once, and since we counted the triple group 3 times, we need to subtract it twice.

Hi Stuart,

https://www.beatthegmat.com/210-bags-con ... 31800.html

Im unable to solve the problem in the link, with mentioned formula, not sure if this would apply here..

Can you please help in solving this?

Tx
I posted a solution to the almonds problem here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/can-you-plea ... 86595.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Washington DC
Thanked: 1 times

by iwillsurvive101 » Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:23 pm
I still don't get the formula. It makes sense for this problem, but I may not be able to relate the formule to a different problem of same type.

Can you please explain some logic, explanation for the Venn Diagram formula? Where can we get more examples to practice such problems?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:02 am
Thanked: 2 times

by kakz » Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:46 am
@Mitch
Why can't this one be solved as follows?
Let h be the number of only history students
Let e be the number of only english students
Let m be the number of only maths students

x be the number of both maths and english
y be the number of both english and history
z be the number of both history and maths

we need to fin the value of x+y+z

68=25+25+34-x-y-z+3
68=84-(x+y+z)+3
x+y+z=19

Why it can't be solved this way?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Thanked: 236 times
Followed by:54 members
GMAT Score:770

by GmatMathPro » Sat Nov 19, 2011 2:39 pm
kakz wrote: x be the number of both maths and english
y be the number of both english and history
z be the number of both history and maths

we need to fin the value of x+y+z

68=25+25+34-x-y-z+3
68=84-(x+y+z)+3
x+y+z=19

Why it can't be solved this way?
The method you've used is only valid if x,y, and z are also counting the people who are taking all three classes. So if you try to use this method, when you do x+y+z, the people who are taking all three classes are counted three times. But we don't want to count these people at all, so we have to subtract them 3 times, which would give us 19-3(3)=10.

Analyzing your method step-by-step: Let's say we define x,y, and z to represent the number of people taking EXACTLY two of the classes, which I assume was your intent if you expected x+y+z to be the right answer. When you add 25+25+34 you count the people who are taking exactly one class once, the people who are taking exactly two classes twice, and the people who are taking exactly three classes three times. When you subtract x,y,z you are now counting the people who are taking exactly one class once, the people who are taking exactly two classes once, but you are still counting the number of people taking exactly three classes three times because when we subtract x,y,z, we're not subtracting ANY of the people taking all three classes, because we defined the variables to only include those taking EXACTLY two classes. When you add the number of people taking all three classes at the end, now you're counting the people taking exactly one class once, the people taking exactly two classes once, and the people taking exactly three classes FOUR times. These people are being vastly overcounted, so you have no reasonable expectation that this should all add up to the total number of people, 68, making your equation invalid. Instead of adding three, you should have subtracted six, because you WERE counting them 3 times and to get everything to add to 68 you should only be counting everybody once, so you need to subtract 3 from this total twice. This would make x+y+z=10

Remember that the point of adding in the number of people who are in all three groups in a problem like this is because they usually get undercounted once you subtract out the people who are in at least two sets. Normally you add everyone in at least one set and the people in exactly one, two, and three sets are counted 1,2 and 3 times respectively. Then you subtract out the people in at least two sets and the people are counted 1, 1, and 0 times. Then you have to add in the people in all the sets to get it back to 1, 1, 1 so that everybody is counted exactly once. But here the people in all three sets are not undercounted because they weren't part of the groups we were subtracting out. And if they're not undercounted, it makes no sense to add them back in.
Pete Ackley
GMAT Math Pro
Free Online Tutoring Trial