BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Meteorologists say that

Expert replies
by abhijeetsinghai » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:04 pm
Meteorologists say that if only they could design an accurate mathematical model of the atmosphere with all its complexities, they could forecast the weather with real precision. But this is an idle boast, immune to any evaluation, for any inadequate weather forecast would obviously be blamed on imperfections in the model.
Which of the following, if true, could best be used as a basis for arguing against the author’s position that the meteorologists’ claim cannot be evaluated?
(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.
(B) Most significant gains in the accuracy of the relevant mathematical models are accompanied by clear gains in the precision of weather forecasts.
(C) Mathematical models of the meteorological aftermath of such catastrophic events as volcanic eruptions are beginning to be constructed.
(D) Modern weather forecasts for as much as a full day ahead are broadly correct about 80 percent of the time.
(E) Meteorologists readily concede that the accurate mathematical model they are talking about is not now in their power to construct.

I am confused between A and B....
OA after some responses....thanks !!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Sher1 » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:15 pm
I would go with B. Argument seems more robust than A. But definitely not an easy question.
Join the discussion

by dendude » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:54 pm
I agree its B.

The question asks for an option that could be used as a basis for arguing that the meteorologist's claim can be evaluated.
B clearly fits the bill, since it says that gains in the precision of weather forecasts indicate the accuracy of the model used.
Join the discussion

by abhijeetsinghai » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:59 pm
how u ppl eliminated A ? It can also be used to evaluate the argument.
Join the discussion

by dendude » Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:17 pm
abhijeetsinghai wrote:how u ppl eliminated A ? It can also be used to evaluate the argument.
OK the questions says,
Which of the following, if true, could best be used as a basis for arguing against the author’s position that the meteorologists’ claim cannot be evaluated?

So we are looking for the best option here.
Though A can be used, it lacks clarity and is not a firm basis for arguing.
Note the use of the word can and the reference to exact causal mechanisms that cannot be fully understood.
Now compare this with what's mentioned in B. See the difference?
Join the discussion

by abhi75 » Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:41 pm
I am more inclined to go for A though. We need an answer to argue against the author's position that the forecast cannot be evaluate.

To evaluate something you would need some data points and argument A. provides that. Based on the unusual configuration of data (as basis of precise whether) we can evaluate whether the model is accurate or not by feeding in different data.

Whats the OA ?
Join the discussion

by abhijeetsinghai » Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:31 pm
OA: B

Thanks everybody !!
Join the discussion

Option A?

by krishnakumarhod » Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:47 pm
(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.

Please correct me if i am wrong but is'nt A strengthens the argument.

It simply says certain data can be used eventhough it does not clearly show how the relations work
So w/o understanding the relations here how can one expect a mathematical model to be construted...I think it simply means

It is like saying
'When there is a rain in chile,new york 10 days later it rains in my city hmm...I really do know how it happens'

When there is a mathematical model involved
'If it rains in nearby city of A some low pressure develops in some 50 mile radius so due to that so and so happens' in this case there is a causal explanation arising from a mathematical model


Due correct me if i am wrong on this explanation
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sat May 14, 2016 1:25 am
I'm going with B.
Join the discussion