-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
How To Read A Sentence Correction Problem
After our article last week on how to read a Critical Reasoning problem, I received a request for a similar article addressing Sentence Correction (SC).
So, here you go! Were going to address what we should do on any and every sentence correction question, regardless of the particular grammar rules tested in that problem.
Before you start: Keeping track of your thinking / answers
One of the biggest mistakes people make is not keeping track of their thinking as they assess the answers. On verbal in general, were usually going to do two passes through the answers. On our first pass, were deciding between this is definitely wrong Im never going to look at this again and maybe We dont try to decide which answer is the right answer when we havent even seen all of the choices yet.
Then, on our second pass, well look only at the maybe choices. Perhaps well only have one, in which case we now have our right answer. If we have more than one, then well have to start comparing the two and figure out how to narrow down from there. Okay, now on to Sentence Correction specifically.
Read the original sentence in its entirety
Another big mistake people make is focusing too much on the words in the underline and not enough on the rest of the sentence. The part that isnt underlined is correct, of course, and cant be changed and thats exactly why we need to pay attention to it. Often, there are things in the non-underlined part that tell us what we need to have in the underlined part in order to match.
As youre reading the original sentence in its entirety, ask yourself: is this all okay? Are there any definite errors? Does anything sound not-quite-right?
If we spot an actual error in the original sentence, we immediately cross off answer choice A on the scratch paper. (Remember that answer A is always identical to the original sentence.) We then scan the other answers in the same location to find any that repeat the same error and cross those off, too. Every time you find an error on SC, immediately look at the remaining answers to see whether you can cross off any others for the same reason. We repeat this process with any other actual errors in the original. (But dont spend a ton of time hunting for those errors; if we dont see anything pretty much right away, we should move on to another approach.)
If something sounds not-quite-right, then we ask ourselves why. Which part, specifically, sounds not quite right? How else is that particular part written in the other answer choices? If we can use these questions to identify an actual error, then we deal with it as described in the previous paragraph. If we cant get beyond it just doesnt sound right, we dont do anything with that information; instead, we start looking for something else to use. In particular, unless we can find a definite error, we do not eliminate answer choice A at this stage.
Processing answers B, C, D, and E
After weve dealt with everything that we can deal with in the original sentence (and sometimes we cant find anything to do!), we start processing the other answers. Possibly we have crossed some off already; possibly we still have all five answer choices left. Our next task is to scan the remaining answer choices vertically to find differences, or splits. Splits represent differences in the answer choices for the same general part of the sentence. The split might be as simple as a difference in one word (e.g., has vs. have) or as complicated as re-wording or moving an entire clause (e.g., changing a modifier into part of the sentence core or placing a modifier at the beginning of the sentence vs. the end).
There are typically multiple splits in any SC problem. There are a couple of important things to know about splits:
- A split does not always indicate an error! Sometimes, differences are introduced but both variations are grammatically correct; the test writers are trying to get us to waste time on something that wont actually help us answer the question.
- There is always a split at the beginning of the underline and there is always a split at the end of the underline. That is, at least one answer choice among B, C, D, and E will vary from the original sentence at the beginning of the underline, and at least one answer choice among B, C, D, and E will vary from the original sentence at the end of the underline.
How do we use that information? First, we always know exactly where two of the splits will be: at the beginning of the choices and at the end. We can look there first to see what kinds of differences exist in this sentence (though we have to remember that a difference doesnt necessarily mean an error).
We do not need to deal with the splits in any particular kind of order. Each person simply looks for the first one that she/he knows how to process. If we can deal with it, we deal with it and cross off any answer choices that use the version that we decided was incorrect. If we dont know how to deal with a particular split, then we shouldnt even try. Instead, we should immediately look for something else that we do know how to do.
Educated guessing
Hopefully, the above process will get us down to just one answer choice; this doesnt always happen, of course. As a result, we also need to study how to make an educated guess, so that we will know what to do when we do have to guess on a problem. For example, generally speaking, in a split between like and such as, the latter form, such as, is more commonly a part of the right answer. Generally speaking, in a split between being and some other form that expresses the same meaning, some other form is more commonly part of the right answer. If we can put an action noun in regular noun form rather than gerund form, then that is also somewhat more likely to be correct. These are not actual rules we will not always get the question right by following these guessing procedures. But we can increase the odds that we might guess right.
Go back to a bunch of SC problems youve already done from one category (e.g., modifiers). Identify some splits and develop some hypotheses about how and why you would guess between those splits if you werent sure of the rule. Then try to apply that thinking to new SC problems in future in order to see whether your guessing strategy is valid. If it isnt working, abandon that hypothesis and try another. (This is also something you can discuss on the forums with the experts and your fellow students.)
Take-aways
On all Sentence Correction questions:
- Keep track of your thinking on your scrap paper. Your first pass is to decide between definitely wrong and maybe. Your second pass is to determine which of the maybe choices youre actually going to pick.
- Read the original question in its entirety. Unless you can pinpoint a specific error, dont eliminate answer choice A.
- Whenever you find an error, immediately scan any remaining choices and eliminate those that repeat the same error.
- Practice making educated guesses and study how you are going to make the decision when you do have to guess.
Recent Articles
Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009