BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manhattan Q

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by samirpandeyit62 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:38 am
stmt 1: x/|x|< x

say x =-5 then we have here -1 < -5 (not valid)

say x= -1 then -1 < -1 (not valid)

sat x = 0.99 the we have here 1 < 0.99 (again not valid)

now if x= 1 then 1 < 1 (not valid)

so x needs to be greater than 1 ie.e 2 ...

if x=2 then 1<2 (valid)
i.e |2| =2 & so on

so SUFF


(2) |x| > x

this is possible only when x is -ve coz for all +ve values of x
|x| = x

hence x is less than 0 (-ve)
so SUFF (|x| is less than 1 )

so ans should be D
Regards
Samir
Join the discussion

Re: Manhattan Q

by gabriel » Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:43 am
[email protected] wrote:If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x|< x

(2) |x| > x
Samir ur solution is wrong ..

the question says x not equal to 0 , so x can be any real number other than 0 , it then asks if mod (x) is less than 1 .. this is possible only when -1<x<1 ..

take a look at the second statement ...

over here if x = -0.1 ( x will be negative ) then mod(x)=0.1 and mod(x)> x .. also x can be -5... mod(x) =5 and > x .. so second statement is not sufficient as mod (x) can be greater than or less than 1 ..

now, take a look at the first statement ..

it says x/mod(x)<x .. now there are 2 possibilites over here

1.)x is a real number greater than 1 .. for eg x =2 in which case x/mod(x) is < x .. in this case mod(x)>1

2.) x is a negative number between -1 and 0 .. in this case too x/mod(x) < x .. if x is < -1 then x/mod(x) > x .. in this case mod(x)<1 ..

So the first statement is also insufficient ..

Now, combine the 2 statements .. from the 2nd statement w know x has to be negative and from the first statement we know that if x is negative then it has to be between -1 and 0 .. so the answer is C ..
Join the discussion

by samirpandeyit62 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:07 am
Thanks Gabreil for correcting, did this one a little hastily (plus some good work load) forgot to evaluate the range between 0 & -1 (which is IMO a danger zone in all abs val questions), thanks buddy for pointing out, I really expect this from u :) .
Regards
Samir
Join the discussion