Kaustubhk wrote:Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

(2) |x - 3| > 0

The OA is C

Hi Mates,

My approach

Is |x| < 1?

We need to find -1<x<1, whether x falls in this range.

1) |x+1| = 2|x-1|

First i considered positive sign,

x+1 = 2x-2

x=3.. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

Now consider negative sign,

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)

-x-1 =-2x +2

x= 3 .. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

A is insufficient.

2) |x-3| >0

First consider positive sign,

x-3>0

x>3..This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

Now consider negative sign

-(X-3) >0

-X+3>0

-X>-3

X<3..This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,

If i go by my approach the answer would be E.

When i checked the solution,

The step where i take negative sign for 1st case, therein the opposite sign is used.

*Opposite signs*

(x+1) = -2(x-1)

x+1 =-2x +2

x= 1/3 .. This falls in the range -1<x<1,

I'm confused as to why opposite signs are taken..

Hi Kaustubhk,

I think you need someone to teach the concepts of Data Sufficiency. Data Sufficiency questions test whether the information given in a statement/statements is sufficient or not.

Even if one is sure that the given information is sufficient to prove that we cannot reach a unique result, you are still in a position to answer the question.

In Statement 1, you twice write "This doesn't fall in the range." Since there is no contradiction, you can conclude or answer the question. (However, the red part is wrong!).

Secondly, you need to sharpen your fundamental about the concept of absolute numbers.

I correct the red part of your working.

Statement 1:

Now consider negative sign,

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)

-x-1 =-2x +2

x= 3 .. This doesn't fall in the range -1<x<1,
IT SHOULD BE:

Now consider negative sign,

(x+1) = -2(x-1);

Take negative sign only on one side!
x+1 =-2x +2

3x= 1

x = 1/3 .. This

**falls** in the range -1<x<1,

Since there is a contradiction in results: a. DOES NOT FALL for case 1 and b. FALLS for case 2, there is no unique answer!

Regarding Statement 2, you did all fine except that you concluded incorrectly that x < 3 means that This

**doesn't falls** in the range -1<x<1.

What if x = 1/2? x = 1/2 satisfies both x < 3 as well as -1<x<1. So Statement 2 is also a case of contradictory results.

Hope now you can deal with both the statements together.

Hope this helps!

Download free ebook:

Manhattan Review GMAT Quantitative Question Bank Guide
-Jay

_________________

Manhattan Review GMAT Prep
Locations:

New York |

Bangkok |

Abu Dhabi |

Rome | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor!

Click here.