Manhattan gmat DS question - doesn't make sense

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:31 am

Manhattan gmat DS question - doesn't make sense

by sk123 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:12 am
Does anyone get this manhattan gmat question. I tried to understand their reason but it didn't make any sense ... just wanna see if anyone has another way of doing it.

If a^2 is not equal to b^2, what is the value of

a - b
__________ ?
a^2 – b^2




(1) 3^b + 2 = 81

(2) a = 3^2b – 3

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:00 am
Thanked: 3 times

by ontopofit » Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:36 am
IMO C

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:31 am

by sk123 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:52 am
Here's the answer:

(1) SUFFICIENT: We can rewrite this equation in a base of 3: 3b + 2 = 34, which means that b + 2 = 4 and therefore b = 2.

We can plug this value into the equation a = 3b – 1 to solve for a.

(2) SUFFICIENT: We can set the right side of this equation equal to the right side of the equation in the question (both sides equal a). 3b – 1 = 32b – 3, which means that b – 1 = 2b – 3 and therefore b = 2.

We can plug this value into the equation a = 3b – 1 to solve for a.

The correct answer is D.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:2 members

by schumi_gmat » Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:14 pm
we have to find 1/(a+b). The a-b can be cancelled as a-b not equal to 0

From A) 3^(b+2) = 81, i.e. b+2=4 and b=2

We dont know value of a. Hence insuff

From B) a= 3^2b-3

one equation, 2 variables. Hence insuff

Hence ans is C.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:31 am

by sk123 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:48 pm
The answer I posted above is from Manhattan gmat ... from one of the online exams ...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:26 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:720

by mygmat.2009 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:41 pm
I agree with schumi_gmat , unless sky123 is missing to give us part of the question!

Sky123, in your answer you mention equation [a = 3b – 1], yet the question you posted does not mention this equality.


Sam

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 986
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:07 am
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
Followed by:1 members

by gabriel » Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:49 am
sk123 wrote:Here's the answer:

(1) SUFFICIENT: We can rewrite this equation in a base of 3: 3b + 2 = 34, which means that b + 2 = 4 and therefore b = 2.

We can plug this value into the equation a = 3b – 1 to solve for a.

(2) SUFFICIENT: We can set the right side of this equation equal to the right side of the equation in the question (both sides equal a). 3b – 1 = 32b – 3, which means that b – 1 = 2b – 3 and therefore b = 2.

We can plug this value into the equation a = 3b – 1 to solve for a.

The correct answer is D.
Where did you get a=3b-1 from?, it is not part of the question. So if the question is correct then schumi_gmat is correct.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:31 am

by sk123 » Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:44 pm
That's what I was trying to get at ... that is the official answer from the manhattan gmat exam. I was thinking I might be missing something but I guess their expl doesn't add up.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:56 am
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:700

by Uri » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:17 pm
utterly confused! first i thought MGMAT has used technique to convert decimal number to a different base (base of 3 in stead of base of 10). but after following more carefully i understood that it was not so. don't understand from where they have got the other equation.

sk123, if you enclosed the exponents within brackets, that would have been better for understanding. but any way, this solution by MGMAT is very confusing.

if the question and the solution is reproduced correctly, then can any MGMAT tutor available here please help us?

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:57 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by fleshins » Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:24 pm
how does this make any sense either?

"We can rewrite this equation in a base of 3: 3b + 2 = 34, which means that b + 2 = 4 and therefore b = 2."

Thanks for the explanation, if there is one ...