As part of an effort to gain a deeper understanding of GMAT question structure as well as the underlying math concepts, I am making an effort to create several original questions every day. Has anybody tried this, or have any thoughts or advice on good ways of doing it?
Here is one based on remainders:
What is the remainder r when positive integer x is divided by 4?
1) x is odd
2) x is a multiple of 3
Answer is E
Making up DS questions
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:27 am
- Thanked: 7 times
What is the remainder r when positive integer x is divided by 4?
Only possible remainders are 0, 1, 2, and 3
1) x is odd
Only possible remainders are 1 and 3
9/4 -> Remainder is 1
11/4 -> Remainder is 3
13/4 -> Remainder is 1
15/4 -> Remainder is 3
Insufficient
2) x is a multiple of 3
Multiples of 3 are : 3, 6, 9, 12
Possible remainders are
3/4 -> Remainder is 3
6/4 -> Remainder is 2
9/4 -> Remainder is 1
9/4 -> Remainder is 0
Insufficient
Together: x is odd and x is a multiple of 3
3, 9, 15, 21, 27, 33, 39 etc...
3/4 -> Remainder is 3
9/4 -> Remainder is 1
15/4 -> Remainder is 3
21/4 -> Remainder is 1
Togther: Insufficient
Therefore, answer is E
Only possible remainders are 0, 1, 2, and 3
1) x is odd
Only possible remainders are 1 and 3
9/4 -> Remainder is 1
11/4 -> Remainder is 3
13/4 -> Remainder is 1
15/4 -> Remainder is 3
Insufficient
2) x is a multiple of 3
Multiples of 3 are : 3, 6, 9, 12
Possible remainders are
3/4 -> Remainder is 3
6/4 -> Remainder is 2
9/4 -> Remainder is 1
9/4 -> Remainder is 0
Insufficient
Together: x is odd and x is a multiple of 3
3, 9, 15, 21, 27, 33, 39 etc...
3/4 -> Remainder is 3
9/4 -> Remainder is 1
15/4 -> Remainder is 3
21/4 -> Remainder is 1
Togther: Insufficient
Therefore, answer is E
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Hi Topspin!
What a great idea - I think you're onto something here.
Not to publish the recipe to the secret sauce, but my method for writing DS questions is basically this:
Step 1: Hey, I'm feeling bored - guess I'll try a few math problems.
Step 2: Ah, that one was easy - what's next?
Step 3: Wait, what the hell? I was wrong? That can't possibly be true! (*flipping smugly to the answer explanations*) Oh, it's because I assumed x was an integer? $#%^@!
Step 4: Hey, I'm going to write a DS problem using a trick just like that!
It certainly helps me avoid making the same mistake twice.
Remember that DS questions are all about tricking people into making easy, natural, and ultimately fatal assumptions: the test writers are measuring your ability to be skeptical of a seemingly good thing and thus review its implications before accepting it - obviously a pretty crucial skill in the often devious and ruthless world of business!
What a great idea - I think you're onto something here.
Not to publish the recipe to the secret sauce, but my method for writing DS questions is basically this:
Step 1: Hey, I'm feeling bored - guess I'll try a few math problems.
Step 2: Ah, that one was easy - what's next?
Step 3: Wait, what the hell? I was wrong? That can't possibly be true! (*flipping smugly to the answer explanations*) Oh, it's because I assumed x was an integer? $#%^@!
Step 4: Hey, I'm going to write a DS problem using a trick just like that!
It certainly helps me avoid making the same mistake twice.
Remember that DS questions are all about tricking people into making easy, natural, and ultimately fatal assumptions: the test writers are measuring your ability to be skeptical of a seemingly good thing and thus review its implications before accepting it - obviously a pretty crucial skill in the often devious and ruthless world of business!