LSAT CR

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:29 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

LSAT CR

by crimson2283 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:18 am
The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based?
(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
(B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.
(C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.
(D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence. He or she will never accept government funding.
(E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:07 pm
E it is
(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
Cant conclude from Etons conc. that the Funding would be a burden
(B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.
Irrelevant
(C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.
Irrelevant
(D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence. He or she will never accept government funding.
The stimulus is concerned with the production of objects of artistic excellence after the funds are received by the Artist
(E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.
This bridges the gap betweeen the independent artistic conscience of the artist and true artistic excellence
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:10 pm
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:2 members

by hja379 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 1:03 pm
IMO E

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:10 pm
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:2 members

by hja379 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 1:10 pm
(C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.
I don't think C is irrelevant here. If the govt. distributes funds on conditions as to what it deems as artistic excellence, then it defeats the purpose. As artistic excellence should reflect the conscience of the artist and not that of the govt. But if you apply the denial test on this, the conclusion does not fall apart. There is a claim in the argument that already states that govt. tries to influence the artist. So E would be a better option and without the assumption, the conclusion is not true. If I am off on the explanation, please feel free to chime in.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:43 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by cyrwr1 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:40 pm
I'm going with E as well.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:5 members

by Target2009 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 4:48 pm
+1 E
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student