• 7 CATs FREE!
    If you earn 100 Forum Points

    Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
    100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE

    Veritas Prep
    VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS
    Earn 10 Points Per Post
    Earn 10 Points Per Thanks
    Earn 10 Points Per Upvote
    REDEEM NOW

Leslie and Kerri

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: 16 May 2009

Leslie and Kerri

by bharatv » Wed May 27, 2009 4:01 am
Over the last two years, who made more money investing in stock market, leslie or kerri?

(1) Leslie made an average return of 20% and Kerri made an average return of 5%.

(2) Kerri started with two times as much money as Leslie.

Can someone explain the steps?

OA - E

Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Wed May 27, 2009 4:24 am
I am getting the answer as [spoiler](C)[/spoiler]

:shock:

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Thanked: 1 times

by tdadic84 » Wed May 27, 2009 6:32 am
im also getting C...can someone explain please..

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 99
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Location: NYC
Thanked: 43 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:800

by Jose Ferreira » Wed May 27, 2009 7:09 am
One of the most important tips I can offer on Data Sufficiency is to pay attention when the GMAT gives you a bit of information without calling much attention to it.

In this case, I am honing in on the fact that statement 1 talks about the "average" returns each person received.

To establish a lack of sufficiency, because the answer is E, we need to create a situation in which Leslie makes more and a situation in which Kerri makes more.

Scenario 1 - Leslie makes more
Leslie starts with $100 and makes 20% both years.
100(1.2)(1.2) = 144
Kerri starts with $200 and makes %5 both years.
200(1.05)(1.05) = 220.50

If we can come up with a scenario in which Leslie makes less that $20.50, then the answer must be E.

Scenario 2 - Kerri makes more
Leslie starts with $100. She loses 50% the first year and gains 90% the second year. We can do this, because the average of (-50) and (90) is 20.
100(.5)(1.9)= 95

In this scenario, she did average +20% returns, but she actually lost $5 over the two years.

The answer is E
Jose Ferreira
Founder and CEO, Knewton, Inc.
https://www.knewton.com/gmat

Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Wed May 27, 2009 10:42 am
Jose,

I assumed values for L and K (K double than L). I calculated 20% for L and 5% for K. I doubled the values to get the amount for 2 years. For all values of L and K, I got L gaining more than K.

Sticking to the approach I have followed, how can I get (E) as the answer?