• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## basic issue on pronoun issue ##### This topic has expert replies Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Posts: 10 Joined: 10 Jan 2010 ### basic issue on pronoun issue by rojans » Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:51 am Hi all, This doubt is regarding Pronoun Reference: We know that a pronoun has to refer to ONE & ONLY ONE antecedent and any ambiguity in this regard means a wrong answer. For eg : Josie plays with Tina daily so that she remains fit --- This is wrong because "She" seems to be referring to the closest noun Tina whereas it can refer to both of them. This is understood. In this ex., both the subjects could be logically used to replace "She". But what if the former noun cannot be LOGICALLY used ?!?! For ex : Workers manufacture cars so that they can earn money. Now here the closest noun to "they" is "cars" but we know "cars" CANNOT make "money". So "they" has to logically refer to "workers" only. So in this case, is this choice correct or is it still ambiguos !!?! What if the sentence was: Cars are manufactured by workers so that they can make more money. (Please ignore the passiveness of the sentence) Here the closest noun is "Workers" and "they" is logically referring to it too. But technically, since "cars" and "workers" are both plural, it can refer to both of them. In this case, is this also ambiguos or is the answer correctly framed !!?!? Lastly: What if the sentence was: Each car is manufactured by workers so that they can make money. Now here, "car" is singular while "workers" are plural. Now since "they" is plural .... Does this automatically mean that "they" refers to "workers". What if the nouns were flipped to say: Workers manufacture a car so that they can make money. Here, here, "car" is singular while "workers" are plural. So even though "they" is plural, it is closest to "car" .... Does this make the choice wrong or will here too the sentence automatically mean that "they" refers to "workers". Would really appreciate a quick response ..... Thanks a lot in advance ..... If any of the expert instructors here such as Ron & Stacey have already answered a similiar query, then i would be obiliged if someone could pl give me the link. I have tried to find it but in this vast ocean of topics, haven't been successful!!! .....The original person was someone else,He posted this on Manhattan fourm,But he didn't get answer so do I. Please demigods answer this question seriously On time too........ MBA Admissions Consultant Posts: 2278 Joined: 11 Nov 2011 Location: New York Thanked: 660 times Followed by:266 members GMAT Score:770 by Jim@StratusPrep » Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:18 am You are right with your statement that 1 pronoun must relate to 1 noun. Even despite logical reasoning, workers and cars in the same sentence cannot have a 'they.' Even though cars do not make money, in theory it creates confusion. What if the cars were appreciating in value? The other examples where you switching to a singular car, you can use they because it refers to the workers. Hope this helps. GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform. -- Push button course navigation to simplify planning -- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline -- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility -- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions -- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions -- 100% Free Trial and less than$20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Thanked: 13 times
by shekhar.kataria » Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:58 am
Hi Jim

Can you quote atlest one OG question where the sentence has two noun referents and where logically only one stands as far as the meaning is concerned but still the answer is incorrect.