BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Large Vocabulary

Expert replies
by g000fy » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:54 am
Being articulate has been equated with having a large vocabulary. Actually, however, people with large vocabularies have no incentive for, and tend not to engage in, the kind of creative linguistic self-expression that is required when no available words seem adequate. Thus a large vocabulary is a hindrance to using language in a truly articulate way.

Which one of the following is an assumption made in the argument?
(A) When people are truly articulate, they have the capacity to express themselves in situations in which their vocabularies seem inadequate.
(B) People who are able to express themselves creatively in new situations have little incentive to acquire large vocabularies.
(C) The most articulate people are people who have large vocabularies but also are able to express themselves creatively when the situation demands it.
(D) In educating people' to be more articulate, it would be futile to try to increase the size of their vocabularies.
(E) In unfamiliar situations, even people with large Vocabularies often do not have specifically suitable words available.

Source - Aristotle CR / LSAT CRs

OA - A
Last edited by g000fy on Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shovan85 » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:41 am
IMO E

[P]People with large vocabulary use the words only when there is no other word to use.

Which one of the following is an assumption made in the argument?
(A) Yes that is the way they use.
(B) Acquiring vocabulary
(C) If they can use then why it will be a hindrance
(D) Why discuss educating people.
(E) In unfamiliar situations, even people with large Vocabularies often do not have specifically suitable words available.

[C] Thus a large vocabulary is a hindrance to using language in a truly articulate way.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:51 am
I liked A to begin with, and then POE confirms A as my answer choice.

B: Pretty strong language, and this might fit more for a conclusion than an assumption.
C: The stimulus is actually implying that people with large vocab aren't articulate.
D: Too strong of implication, like B.
E: Out of scope.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by g000fy » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:59 am
shovan85 wrote:IMO E

[P]People with large vocabulary use the words only when there is no other word to use.

Which one of the following is an assumption made in the argument?
(A) Yes that is the way they use.
(B) Acquiring vocabulary
(C) If they can use then why it will be a hindrance
(D) Why discuss educating people.
(E) In unfamiliar situations, even people with large Vocabularies often do not have specifically suitable words available.

[C] Thus a large vocabulary is a hindrance to using language in a truly articulate way.
I think the paraphrasing is not right for the premise.
people with large vocabularies have no incentive for, and tend not to engage in, the kind of creative linguistic self-expression that is required when no available words seem adequate
IMO, the author is saying people with large vocabs have nothing to gain by speaking in a hi-fi language and so don't speak in that way when required (either they shut up or something). And, so they are not truly articulate even though they posses large vocab
Join the discussion

by g000fy » Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:04 am
uwhusky wrote:I liked A to begin with, and then POE confirms A as my answer choice.

B: Pretty strong language, and this might fit more for a conclusion than an assumption.
C: The stimulus is actually implying that people with large vocab aren't articulate.
D: Too strong of implication, like B.
E: Out of scope.
Alternatively, B can be eliminated on grounds that it talks about incentive to acquire large vocab whereas the premise talks about incentive for the kind of creative linguistic self-expression that is required
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:17 pm
g000fy wrote:Being articulate has been equated with having a large vocabulary. Actually, however, people with large vocabularies have no incentive for, and tend not to engage in, the kind of creative linguistic self-expression that is required when no available words seem adequate. Thus a large vocabulary is a hindrance to using language in a truly articulate way.

Which one of the following is an assumption made in the argument?
(A) When people are truly articulate, they have the capacity to express themselves in situations in which their vocabularies seem inadequate.
(B) People who are able to express themselves creatively in new situations have little incentive to acquire large vocabularies.
(C) The most articulate people are people who have large vocabularies but also are able to express themselves creatively when the situation demands it.
(D) In educating people' to be more articulate, it would be futile to try to increase the size of their vocabularies.
(E) In unfamiliar situations, even people with large Vocabularies often do not have specifically suitable words available.

Source - Aristotle CR / LSAT CRs[/quote
i use POE and i am just between A and B, maybe i will choose A
Join the discussion

by g000fy » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:15 am
The OA is A
Join the discussion

by hcueva » Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:35 am
P1. People with large vocabularies do not use creative language when most words seem inadequate.
C. Large vocabularies are bad if you wanna be articulate.

Assumption = Using creative language when most words seem inadequate is the definition of being articulate.

Answer is A
Join the discussion