BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

KAPLAN CR

Expert replies
by czarczar » Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:40 pm
The mayor's advisers are attempting to alter the widespread public belief that the mayor's restructuring of the city's taxation system is to blame for the poor business climate in the city. They say that the poor business climate is part of a national phenomenon and that the mayor is only blamed because of a coincidence in time: the business climate happened to get worse shortly following the tax restructuring.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the adviser's claim about the reason that the tax restructuring is blamed for the poor business climate?


There was a noticeable deterioration of the city's public transportation system immediately following the tax restructuring but the public drew no connection between the two events.

When the mayor was elected, by a sizeable majority, he had clearly enunciated his intention to restructure the city's taxation system.

Most economists agree that the effects of the tax restructuring on the city's business environment would not be immediately obvious, but would take at least a year to make themselves felt.

Despite the nationwide poor business environment, similar tax restructuring is being planned in cities of similar size throughout the country.

While the public generally objects to anything perceived to be likely to increase their taxes, they are just as quick to object to any reduction in the services supported by tax revenues.

OA : .A
Last edited by czarczar on Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sunnyjohn » Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:45 pm
czarczar wrote:The mayor's advisers are attempting to alter the widespread public belief that the mayor's restructuring of the city's taxation system is to blame for the poor business climate in the city. They say that the poor business climate is part of a national phenomenon and that the mayor is only blamed because of a coincidence in time: the business climate happened to get worse shortly following the tax restructuring.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the adviser's claim about the reason that the tax restructuring is blamed for the poor business climate?


There was a noticeable deterioration of the city's public transportation system immediately following the tax restructuring but the public drew no connection between the two events.

When the mayor was elected, by a sizeable majority, he had clearly enunciated his intention to restructure the city's taxation system.

Most economists agree that the effects of the tax restructuring on the city's business environment would not be immediately obvious, but would take at least a year to make themselves felt.

Despite the nationwide poor business environment, similar tax restructuring is being planned in cities of similar size throughout the country.

While the public generally objects to anything perceived to be likely to increase their taxes, they are just as quick to object to any reduction in the services supported by tax revenues.

OA : After discussion.
Very strange answers. I have not seen the kind of answers before. Though its a weakening question but I got to use POE on it. IMO: A, but honestly I am not satisfied with line of reasoning so I am not providing any explanation until you confirm the OA.
Join the discussion

by czarczar » Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:06 pm
Anyways, I will edit the post with the OA so that others can have a fair chance too.

Yes, it's a weird question. God damn you have not seen RC'S in KAPLAN CATS. This question is nothing in front of them. heh
Join the discussion

by SticklorForDetails » Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:46 pm
It's a "weird" question but, to be honest, exactly the kind of thing you'll see at the higher difficulty levels on the actual GMAT. The most important thing about it is the question stem -- it's not as simple as "strengthen this" or "weaken that" but draws our attention to one particular aspect of the argument: the "reason that the tax restructuring is blamed..." The advisor argues that it is "only blamed because of a coincidence in time," and it is that "only because" that we are supposed to weaken by showing that a coincidence-in-time probably isn't the reason at all, as the correct answer does.

These kinds of questions, with stems that only apply to the given stimulus and draw our attention to a specific part of the Argument that may not be the main Conclusion, are very common among the challenging questions on the real GMAT. They are worth studying!
Experienced tutors, customized study plans, personalized service.

www.GothamTutors.com/adam.html
Join the discussion