Joining sides of a pentagon to form trianges

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 3:53 pm
Hi,

A ) The question in KAPLAN asks. There is a regular pentagon (ABCDE) and F is the center of the pentagon. How many different trianges can be formed by joining 3 points ABCDE and F?

As I understand if you need to chose 3 points out of 6 you do
6C3 = 20


B) Now If the same question was : There is a regular pentagon (ABCDE) how many ways can you join the sides of the pentagon.
You would do 5C2 = 10 ways but since 2 points are adjacent you - 5 from it to get 5 ways.

Question is there something I have missed in B above? Is there a general formula to use when dealing with geometric figures and joining the sides or creating triangles?


I have been able to figure out via trial and error that when you are asked to figure out how many lines can be made by joining the side of a geometric figure like a triangle, square etc, the answer is

nC2 - n
where n is the number of sides.

Can someone confirm this? Are they any other such formulas someone can share in geometry?

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:43 pm
GMAT Score:710

by kiskopata » Thu May 29, 2008 8:38 am
For A:
need 3 points for a triangle from 6points
choice for 1st point: 6
for 2nd: 5
for 3rd: 4
Total 6x5x4=120

It seems like you only want to join the sides for B, and not criss cross the points. It helps to quote the exact problem that you encounter so that we can know what is asked clearly.

5 lines make a pentagon
choices for first line: 5
2nd: 4
3rd: 3
4th: 2
5th: 1
Total 5x4x3x2x1=120
Try not. Do or do not. There is no try
_______________________________
https://d4dial.blocked

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780
kiskopata wrote:For A:
need 3 points for a triangle from 6points
choice for 1st point: 6
for 2nd: 5
for 3rd: 4
Total 6x5x4=120
This is not correct. If you count this way, you are assuming the order of the points matters- you'd be counting triangle ABF as though it were different from triangle AFB.
pranaysad wrote: B) Now If the same question was : There is a regular pentagon (ABCDE) how many ways can you join the sides of the pentagon.
You would do 5C2 = 10 ways but since 2 points are adjacent you - 5 from it to get 5 ways.
I assume you're asking how many 'diagonals' can be formed in the interior of a regular pentagon by connecting the vertices. Your solution is perfect: you can connect the vertices in 5C2 ways, but you don't want to count the 5 edges.

You can also look at the problem this way: from point A, you can make 5-3 = 2 diagonals; you can't connect A to itself or to either of the two points with which it forms an edge. For a regular n-sided shape, you can make n-3 diagonals. This is true for all five points: you can make 5*2 = 10 diagonals... but you've counted every diagonal exactly twice in this way (you've counted AC and CA as though they were different, but they're the same diagonal). So you must divide by 2, and the answer is 5.
pranaysad wrote: Question is there something I have missed in B above? Is there a general formula to use when dealing with geometric figures and joining the sides or creating triangles?

I have been able to figure out via trial and error that when you are asked to figure out how many lines can be made by joining the side of a geometric figure like a triangle, square etc, the answer is

nC2 - n
where n is the number of sides.

Can someone confirm this? Are they any other such formulas someone can share in geometry?
For diagonals inside a regular n-sided shape, your formula is perfectly good:

diagonals = nC2 - n

Or, looking at it the way I did above, from each point you can make (n-3) diagonals; there are n points; we must divide by two to avoid counting each diagonal twice:

diagonals = n*(n-3)/2

If you expand the formula you found above (nC2 - n), you'll see that both of these are equal.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:38 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by llewellyn27 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:42 pm
can u expand on this formula.

Have not seen it in a while