The voluminous personal papers of Thomas Alva Edison reveal that his inventions typically sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly from previous works.
(A) sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly
(B) sprang to life not in a flash of inspiration but were slowly evolved
(C) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly
(D) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but had slowly evolved
(E) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but they were slowly evolved.
Answer is C
My Question:
According to the answer guide, the reason C is the right answer b/c "spring" is parallel to "evolved." "Spring" is in the infinitive and "evolved" is in the past tense, so why can it be in parallel? I understand in the idiomatic structure, Not X...But...Y, X and Y must be parallel. So...two elements can be parallel even if they are in different tenses?
My second question is "had slowly evolved" in D. I guess logically "had slowly evolved" makes sense here (Since the inventions evolve from a much earlier time period to an earlier time period), but is the reason it is wrong here b/c we need to preserve the parallelism of Not..X...But Y?
Thanks!
//ism and Past Perfect Question. Please help :)
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:57 am
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 375 times
- Followed by:53 members
Hi,
'did not spring' is parallel to 'evolved'. 'did not spring' is simple past, 'do/does not spring' is simple present. Hope, this answers your query.
Cheers!
'did not spring' is parallel to 'evolved'. 'did not spring' is simple past, 'do/does not spring' is simple present. Hope, this answers your query.
Cheers!
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 375 times
- Followed by:53 members
Past perfect is used only when two things happen at different times in the past. But, in this case there is no such thing. Hence, simple past is sufficient.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
Here is another question in which the use of past perfect has been advocated by Mitch GmatGuru nY
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og12-sequenc ... tml#365642
Why the use of past perfect not required in this question
The Papers tell us about an action that took place before the papers were written
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og12-sequenc ... tml#365642
Why the use of past perfect not required in this question
The Papers tell us about an action that took place before the papers were written
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:57 am
- Thanked: 1 times