BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is x > y?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Thu Jun 08, 2017 6:41 am
jack0997 wrote:Is x > y?

(1) |x| > |y|
(2) x ‚+ y > 0

OA C
Statement 1:
|x| > |y|

ƒ=> x > y . . . (i): The answer is 'Yes.'
OR
x < -y . . . (ii): The answer is 'No.'
Thus, the answer cannot be uniquely determined. - Insufficient

Statement 2:
x ‚+ y > 0
ƒ=> x > -y . . . (iii)

Case 1: If y < 0: -y > 0 ƒ=> x > -y > 0
Thus, x is positive, hence is greater than y, which is negative: The answer is 'Yes.'

Case 2: If y > 0
We cannot determine whether x is also greater than the positive number y.
The answer may be 'Yes' or 'No.'

Thus, we cannot uniquely determine whether x > y. - Insufficient

Statement 1 & 2 together:

Conditions (ii) and (iii) contradict each other.
Thus, (ii) is not a possible scenario since we know that condition (iii) is true.

Thus, we have:
x > y . . . (i)
AND
x > -y . . . (iii)

The above two conditions are possible simultaneously, for example, if
x ƒ = 2 and y ƒ= 1
x ƒ = 2 and y ƒ = -1

Thus, x > y.

The answer to the question is 'Yes.' - Sufficient

The correct answer: C

Hope this helps!

Relevant book: Manhattan Review GMAT Data Sufficiency Guide

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Beijing | Auckland | Milan | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:21 pm
Hi jack0997,

This DS question can be solved with a mix of TESTing VALUES and Number Properties.

We're asked if X is greater than Y. This is a YES/NO question.

1) |X| > |Y|

IF...
X=1, Y=0
Then the answer to the question is YES.

X=-1, Y=0
Then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) X+Y > 0

This Fact tells us that AT LEAST one of the two variables MUST be greater than 0....

IF...
X=1, Y=0
Then the answer to the question is YES.

X=0, Y=1
Then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we know that at least one of the two variables is greater than 0, so there are 2 options to consider:
1) BOTH X and Y are greater than 0. In this case, since |X| > |Y|, so X would have to be greater than Y.
2) One variable is positive and one is negative. In this case, since X+Y > 0, the positive value would have to be "more positive" than the other number is "negative" (for example +3 and -2). With the added restriction that |X| > |Y|, X would have to be the positive value and Y would have to be the negative value. Thus, X would always be greater than Y.

In both options, the answer to the question is YES.
Combined, SUFFICIENT

Final Answer: C

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Jun 08, 2017 5:19 pm
S1:

|x| > |y|

In words, this says "x is further from 0 than y is". This is true if x = 3 and y = 2, but it's also true if x = 3 and y = -2. Not sufficient!

S2:

x + y > 0

x > -y

OK, so x is greater than -y ... but we want to know if it's greater than y itself. Not sufficient!

Together, let's suppose that y > x > -y. (We know from S2 that x > -y, so we're trying the negative case, the one in which y is somehow greater than x.) If that's true, then both y and -y are further from 0 than x is. That contradicts S1, so it's impossible! That means that y > x doesn't work, and we must have x > y. After all that, our answer is C.
Join the discussion