BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is X<Y ?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by eagleeye » Sat Jul 07, 2012 8:58 am
We need to find if x<y

I) if 2x <3y
2x<3y
=> x < 3/2y
If x=1, y=1 ,x < 3/2y, x=y
If x=1, y=10 ,x< 3/2y, x<y
So, we don't know if x=y or x<y. Insufficient

II) if xy > 0
Using the same cases as above, insufficient.

Together, using the same cases as above, still insufficient.

Hence E is the right answer.
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Sat Jul 07, 2012 8:59 am
Consider the case
1. 2x < 3y
x = 1, y = 1.
2x < 3y => 2 < 3 but x = y
x = 2, y = 3
2x < 3y => 4 < 9 => X < Y INSUFF

2. xy > 0
x = y = 1 => xy > 0 but x = y
x = 2, y = 3 => xy > 0 x < y INSUFF

Combining both we can have both the possibilities.

IMO E.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:42 pm
Great approaches above but we can speed up even further by replacing math with reasoning.

The question is asking you whether one thing is smaller (or bigger) than another.

(1) tells you that 2 of one thing is smaller than 3 of another. That's not enough to tell whether one thing is smaller (bigger) than the other. Insufficient.

(2) tells you that x and y share the same sign. Well, that tells you nothing about their relative magnitude; (2) is completely useless.

Combining, we have insufficient (1) with useless (2) so in combo we still have no sufficiency.

Choose (E).
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion