Is x > 3^10 ?

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
Location: madrid
Thanked: 171 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:790

Is x > 3^10 ?

by kevincanspain » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:45 am
Is x > 3^10 ?

(1) x > 3^12 - 3^4
(2) x > 10^5
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:00 am
Thanked: 3 times

by gaurav_gaur » Sun Apr 28, 2013 6:04 pm
1) x > 3^12 - 3^4
i.e. x > 3^4*(3^8-1).......(a)

if I look back at the question it states that
is x > 3^10
i.e. x > 3^4 * 3^6.......(b)

By comparing the 2 inequalities a and b, I can infer that if
(3^8-1) > 3^6 then x > 3^10.

Simply by looking at the equation i can say that 3^8 is any day greater than 3^6 and subtracting 1 from 3^8 will not harm the result much. thus,
x > 3^4(3^8 - 1)
and hence x > 3^4 * 3^6

So statement 1 is sufficient.


2)x > 10^5
again, if I look back at the question it states that
is x > 3^10
i.e. x > 9^5

10^5>9^5

so x > 10^5
then x > 9^5 as well.

So statement 2 is sufficient.

OA should be D

Cheers,
GG

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 423
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:59 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Thanked: 86 times
Followed by:2 members

by srcc25anu » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:27 am
Is x > 3^10?

1. x > 3^12 - 3^4
x > 3^4 (3^8 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^4 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^2 + 1) * (3^2 - 1)
x > 3^4 * ~3^4 * ~3^2 * ~3^2
x > ~3^12

Sufficient

2. x > 10^5
3^2 = 9
(3^2)^5 or 3^10 = 9^5

10^5 is greater than 9^5
Sufficient

Ans D

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 344 times
Followed by:86 members

by Anju@Gurome » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:57 am
srcc25anu wrote:1. x > 3^12 - 3^4
x > 3^4 (3^8 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^4 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^2 + 1) * (3^2 - 1)
x > 3^4 * ~3^4 * ~3^2 * ~3^2

x > ~3^12
Although you've got the correct answer, I just want to add that those three lines marked in green are unnecessary time waste. When you can approximate (3^2 - 1) as 3^2, you can definitely approximate (3^8 - 1) as 3^8.

So without doing unnecessary calculations, you can directly approximate (3^4)*(3^8 - 1) as (3^4)*(3^8) = 3^12

Hope that helps.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:01 am
kevincanspain wrote:Is x > 3^10 ?

(1) x > 3^12 - 3^4
(2) x > 10^5
Target question: Is x > 3^10 ?

Statement 1: x > 3^12 - 3^4
We need to compare 3^12 - 3^4 with 3^10.
If 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, then we can be certain that x > 3^10

Here's the "number sense" approach.
First, let's ignore the 3^4 for a moment.
Notice that 3^12 is WAYYYY bigger than 3^10
In fact, since 3^12 = (3^2)(3^10), we can see that 3^12 is 9 TIMES the value of 3^10
As such, subtracting 3^4 from 3^12 is going to have little effect on 3^12.
In other words, we can be quite certain that 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, which means x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, in which case we can be certain that x > 3^10


For those who don't like the number sense approach, here's a quick proof.
First recognize that x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^12 - 3^10
Now examine 3^12 - 3^10
3^12 - 3^10 = 3^10(3^2 - 1) = 3^10(8)
Since 3^10(8) > 3^10, we can write:
x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^12 - 3^10 > 3^10
From here, we can be certain that x > 3^10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x > 10^5
Since 3^2 = 9 and 4^2 = 16, we can say that (3.something^2) = 10
Now replace 10 with (3.something^2)
We get: x > (3.something^2)^5
Simplify: x > (3.something)^10
Since (3.something)^10 > 3^10, we can write: x > (3.something)^10 > 3^10
From here, we can be certain that x > 3^10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 5:27 am
Followed by:1 members

by iamniladri » Wed May 01, 2013 3:54 am
I have simplified the Statement - 2 in the following way:
Given : x > 10^5
Question: Is x > 3^10? ( or x > 9^5)
Because 3^10 can be written as 9^5 as 3^10 = (3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3).
Now, if x > 10^5 then it is certain that x > 9^5. So SUFFICIENT.

Thanks.
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
kevincanspain wrote:Is x > 3^10 ?

(1) x > 3^12 - 3^4
(2) x > 10^5
Target question: Is x > 3^10 ?

Statement 1: x > 3^12 - 3^4
We need to compare 3^12 - 3^4 with 3^10.
If 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, then we can be certain that x > 3^10

Here's the "number sense" approach.
First, let's ignore the 3^4 for a moment.
Notice that 3^12 is WAYYYY bigger than 3^10
In fact, since 3^12 = (3^2)(3^10), we can see that 3^12 is 9 TIMES the value of 3^10
As such, subtracting 3^4 from 3^12 is going to have little effect on 3^12.
In other words, we can be quite certain that 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, which means x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, in which case we can be certain that x > 3^10


For those who don't like the number sense approach, here's a quick proof.
First recognize that x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^12 - 3^10
Now examine 3^12 - 3^10
3^12 - 3^10 = 3^10(3^2 - 1) = 3^10(8)
Since 3^10(8) > 3^10, we can write:
x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^12 - 3^10 > 3^10
From here, we can be certain that x > 3^10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x > 10^5
Since 3^2 = 9 and 4^2 = 16, we can say that (3.something^2) = 10
Now replace 10 with (3.something^2)
We get: x > (3.something^2)^5
Simplify: x > (3.something)^10
Since (3.something)^10 > 3^10, we can write: x > (3.something)^10 > 3^10
From here, we can be certain that x > 3^10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:56 am

by chrislacolla » Wed May 01, 2013 1:14 pm
all of the calculations unnecessary in this case. each statement gives you a value of x- regardless of what that value is, it will allow you answer the original yes/no question. it doesn't matter whether it's yes or no, just that you can answer it given whatever the expressions in 1 and 2 simplify to.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed May 01, 2013 2:22 pm
chrislacolla wrote:all of the calculations unnecessary in this case. each statement gives you a value of x- regardless of what that value is, it will allow you answer the original yes/no question. it doesn't matter whether it's yes or no, just that you can answer it given whatever the expressions in 1 and 2 simplify to.
That would be true if each statement gave us the actual value of x. However, each statement is an inequality (not an equation) and does not give us the value of x.

For example, consider this question.
Is x > 10?
(1) x > 2
(2) x > 3
In this case the each statement does not sufficient.

Conversely, this question analogous to the original question.
Is x > 10?
(1) x > 12
(2) x > 13
Here, each statement is sufficient because each one ensures that x > 10.

So, the given inequalities need to be examined in greater detail than you suggest.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image