-This person, who is hardworking and whose family was killed, is depressed.
(Can 'and' connect 'who' and 'whose'?)
- The cat which was lost and whose mother is still with us was very cute.
(Can 'and' connect 'which' and 'whose' here?. Also, would 'which' be replaced by 'that' as 'cat' is a living thing?)
I would really appreciate you help guys.
Is this parallel?
This topic has expert replies
- ilovemgmat
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:19 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
ilovemgmat wrote:-This person, who is hardworking and whose family was killed, is depressed.
(Can 'and' connect 'who' and 'whose'?)
Yes it's correct because who is the subject over here and whose is the object
- The cat which was lost and whose mother is still with us was very cute.
I think the usage of which is wrong over here because which is used for non restrictive clauses and over here was lost is a restrictive clause i.e an information which is necessary therefore, that should be used
(Can 'and' connect 'which' and 'whose' here?. Also, would 'which' be replaced by 'that' as 'cat' is a living thing?)
I would really appreciate you help guys.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
- Thanked: 37 times
- Followed by:8 members
Hi-- I think we can add COMMAS to correct the sentence. The information inside the commas is an additional information about the cat which was very cute..
The cat, which was lost and whose mother is still with us, was very cute
The cat, which was lost and whose mother is still with us, was very cute
- ilovemgmat
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:19 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
Thanks for the help! I am confused because "which was lost and whose mother is still with us" is an essential modifier that should not be separated by a comma, and so, "which" should be replaced by "that". But "The cat that was lost and whose mother is still with us was very cute" just sounds so awkward! Any additional ideas?saketk wrote:Hi-- I think we can add COMMAS to correct the sentence. The information inside the commas is an additional information about the cat which was very cute..
The cat, which was lost and whose mother is still with us, was very cute
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
- Thanked: 37 times
- Followed by:8 members
What I think is that you need to know the context before deciding what's important. A simple sentence would also do.
The cat was very cute. This sentence looks good to me.
Also the one I posted (with commas, also looks good to me)
As far as awkwardness is concerned - I don't think adding 'that' would make the sentence awkward.
'that' and 'whose' are clearly referring to the cat. So, I think both versions are ok.
FYI when we use comma before 'which', it generally means that 'which' is pointing to the nearest noun before the comma.
The cat was very cute. This sentence looks good to me.
Also the one I posted (with commas, also looks good to me)
As far as awkwardness is concerned - I don't think adding 'that' would make the sentence awkward.
'that' and 'whose' are clearly referring to the cat. So, I think both versions are ok.
FYI when we use comma before 'which', it generally means that 'which' is pointing to the nearest noun before the comma.
- ilovemgmat
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:19 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
MGMAT SC mentions that any essential modifier should not be separated by a comma and that in an essential modifier, "which" should be replaced by "that". My genuine concern- If we are using a comma and "which" here and if it's correct, what explanation makes this exception valid?saketk wrote:What I think is that you need to know the context before deciding what's important. A simple sentence would also do.
The cat was very cute. This sentence looks good to me.
Also the one I posted (with commas, also looks good to me)
As far as awkwardness is concerned - I don't think adding 'that' would make the sentence awkward.
'that' and 'whose' are clearly referring to the cat. So, I think both versions are ok.
FYI when we use comma before 'which', it generally means that 'which' is pointing to the nearest noun before the comma.
"Whoever one is, and wherever one is, one is always in the wrong if one is rude." ~Maurice Baring
Rudeness and sarcasm won't be entertained!
Rudeness and sarcasm won't be entertained!
The usage of which vs that based on essential and non-essential clauses is no longer followed in GMAT. Only the comma rule still holds : comma for a non-essential clause.
You will not have to choose between choices based on restrictiveness and which vs that.
Crick
You will not have to choose between choices based on restrictiveness and which vs that.
Crick
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:6 members
I agree to Crick.
See the example below: [
This cat,..........., with us] makes sense as when you say this cat, you are referring to thte subject already and rest all is additional information. Therefore, the sentence is correct.
Regards
See the example below: [
This cat,..........., with us] makes sense as when you say this cat, you are referring to thte subject already and rest all is additional information. Therefore, the sentence is correct.
Regards