Is positive integer A greater than positive integer B?

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:57 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:3 members
Is positive integer A greater than positive integer B?

(1) A has more factors than B does.

(2) Every prime factor of B is a factor of A.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 344 times
Followed by:86 members

by Anju@Gurome » Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:32 pm
himu wrote:Is positive integer A greater than positive integer B?

(1) A has more factors than B does.
(2) Every prime factor of B is a factor of A.
Consider the following two cases,
  • A = 4, B = 2 ---> A > B
    • --> A has 3 factors and B has 2 factors
      --> Every prime factor of B, i.e. 2 is a factor of A
    A = 6, B = 9 ---> A < B
    • --> A has 4 factors and B has 3 factors
      --> Every prime factor of B, i.e. 3 is a factor of A
Both of the above examples satisfy both the statements but in the first case the answer is YES while in second it is NO.

The correct answer is E.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:19 am
Thanked: 5 times

by sonalibhangay » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:15 am
Hi Anju Ma'am,

If suppose we change statement 2 to say that A and B have same prime factors, does this then change the answer to C?

Thanks.

Sonali.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:48 am
Good question, Sonali - and it actually would still be E. Consider:

A = 3^4 * 2 = 162
B = 2^3 * 3 = 24
(YES)

or

A = 2^4 * 3 = 48 (with 10 factors)
B = 3^3 * 2 = 54 (with 8 factors)
(NO)


And the main reason I wanted to jump in here (sorry, Anju!) is that this question comes from the Veritas Prep question bank, so I have all the stats on it. Less than 20% of users (it's about 19.4%) get this one right as it's written at the top of this thread. People don't do a good job of picking numbers with the goal to prove insufficiency. People often pick similar numbers but don't have a clear goal in mind. Your goal should be to find numbers that give you the opposite answer.

In this case, it's pretty clear that you can get A to be bigger, so how do you try to create a situation in which it's smaller than B? You give it more factors, but you make as many of those factors as possible equal 2, the smallest prime number. Minimum/maximum thinking is really valuable on a lot of GMAT questions, and this is one of them. Your goal to try to get that last "no" is to minimize the value of A's factors and maximize the value of B's.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:19 am
Thanked: 5 times

by sonalibhangay » Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:29 am
Thanks so much Brian,

It becomes clearer that we need to chose and prove the opposite in such questions.

One thing I will work on for sure!

Regards, Sonali.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:06 am

by trafficspinners » Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:44 pm
Brian@VeritasPrep,

Yeah I know its from Veritas, and fortunately I did this question correct.