If a≠0, is a<0?
(1)(a+b-c)/a<0
(2)c>b
OA is C.
Detailed explanations would be appreciated. Thanks
Inequality
This topic has expert replies
- bblast
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
- Thanked: 118 times
- Followed by:33 members
- GMAT Score:710
Hi,
Lets start with the easier stat 2. It is clearly insufficient but it tells us that :
c>b
c-b > 0
b-c < 0 {multiply by -1 and flip}
stat-1 : -> this is also insufficient alone as we don't know the values of B and C.
combining :
(a+b-c) /a < 0
from stat 2-> (b-c) will always be a -ve quantity.
Thus when a is negative the expression on the LHS of the inequality will always be positive.
suppose a = -6 , taking any -ve value of b-c you will get the negative sign on the numerator and denominator cancelled.
On the other hand if we take a as positive then the inequality will hold true until |b-c| > a
for example when b-c = -8 and a = 6 the expression is -1/3 {stat 1 does hold} whereas
b-c = -6 and a = 8 the expression is 1/3
we have 2 values when a is positive and a single value when a is negative hence answer is A is always negative. Lemme know if the trash language above is unclear.![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/grin.png)
Lets start with the easier stat 2. It is clearly insufficient but it tells us that :
c>b
c-b > 0
b-c < 0 {multiply by -1 and flip}
stat-1 : -> this is also insufficient alone as we don't know the values of B and C.
combining :
(a+b-c) /a < 0
from stat 2-> (b-c) will always be a -ve quantity.
Thus when a is negative the expression on the LHS of the inequality will always be positive.
suppose a = -6 , taking any -ve value of b-c you will get the negative sign on the numerator and denominator cancelled.
On the other hand if we take a as positive then the inequality will hold true until |b-c| > a
for example when b-c = -8 and a = 6 the expression is -1/3 {stat 1 does hold} whereas
b-c = -6 and a = 8 the expression is 1/3
we have 2 values when a is positive and a single value when a is negative hence answer is A is always negative. Lemme know if the trash language above is unclear.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/grin.png)
Cheers !!
Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40
My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40
My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 375 times
- Followed by:53 members
Hi,knight247 wrote:If a≠0, is a<0?
(1)(a+b-c)/a<0
(2)c>b
OA is C.
Detailed explanations would be appreciated. Thanks
Great job bblast. You have already solved this. Just my take:
It is clear that each statement alone is insufficient.
Both(1) and (2):
b<c => b-c<0
(a+b-c)/a<0 => 1+(b-c/a) < 0
So, (b-c)/a < -1
We know that (b-c) is negative. So, for (b-c)/a to be negative, a should be positive.
Hence, C
Cheers!
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
- bblast
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
- Thanked: 118 times
- Followed by:33 members
- GMAT Score:710
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,knight247 wrote:If a≠0, is a<0?
(1)(a+b-c)/a<0
(2)c>b
OA is C.
Detailed explanations would be appreciated. Thanks
Great job bblast. You have already solved this. Just my take:
It is clear that each statement alone is insufficient.
Both(1) and (2):
b<c => b-c<0
(a+b-c)/a<0 => 1+(b-c/a) < 0
So, (b-c)/a < -1
We know that (b-c) is negative. So, for (b-c)/a to be negative, a should be positive.
Hence, C
Now that was algebraic sweetness at its very best in the solution by Frank, and not full of BS like my post above.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/shocked.png)
Cheers !!
Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40
My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40
My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
- Thanked: 37 times
- Followed by:8 members
Hi -- Lets start with the easy one-- clearly this number is not sufficient..knight247 wrote:If a≠0, is a<0?
(1)(a+b-c)/a<0
(2)c>b
OA is C.
Detailed explanations would be appreciated. Thanks
now take the first statement
(a+b-c)/a<0 , LHS = (a/a)+ (b-c)/a = [1+ (b-c)/a] <0
This statement also does not solve our problem
From 2nd statement we know that c>b => that b-c will be negative
and a/a =1
Therefore, a has to be greater than zero to make (b-c)/a Negative..
HENCE C