BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

inequality

Expert replies
by poohv005 » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:08 pm
If x and y are integers and x > 0, is y > 0?
(1) 7x - 2y > 0
(2) -y < x

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is
sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by rn4gmat » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:16 pm
IMO the answer to this is E as from both of the statements it cannot be inferred that y >0 or y <0.
Join the discussion

by poohv005 » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:34 pm
please elaborate more, how you solved the stem 2.

2) -Y < X => X> -y
if X = 2 and Y =3
2>-3 therefore Y > 0

please clarify!
Join the discussion

by el_torero » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:40 pm
(1) 7x - 2y > 0

==>
x > 2/7*y (*)

these values satisfy (*):
x = 1, y = 7 ==> y > 0
x = 1, y = -1/2 ==> y < 0

INSUFF



(2) -y < x

==>
x > -y (**)

these values satisfy (**) :
x = 1, y = 7 ==> y > 0
x = 1, y = -1/2 ==> y < 0

INSUFF

Note that these values satisfy both (*) and (**), but does not tell us distinctly if y < 0.

Ans: E
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:29 am
(1)
y can be <0 or >0.

(2)
same case as (1). Try plugging positive and negative numbers

combined
tells us
8x>y
Insuff

Answer E
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion

by pnk » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:35 pm
If x and y are integers and x > 0, is y > 0?
(1) 7x - 2y > 0
(2) -y < x

x>0, x & y intergers
possible values: x : + only; y: +, -, 0

1) x> 2/7 y => y has to be a multiple of 7 for x to be an int => y: 7, -7, 0; x: +
x y x>0 7x-2y>0 y>0
3 7 y y y
3 -7 y y n
1 0 y y n

Insufficient

2) x: +, y: +, -, 0 => to be scenario values same in (1) & (2), take y: 7, -7,0
x y x>0 x+y>0 y>0
1 7 y y y
8 -7 y y n
2 0 y y n

Insufficient

1& 2) x: +, y: 7, -7, 0

x y x>0 7x-2y>0 x+y>0 y>0
3 7 y y y
3 -7 y n n
1 0 y y y
Insufficient (answer E)

Hope it helps. Need one clarification: 7x-2y>0 & x+y>0 => 8x>y (is it correct???)
Join the discussion

by Fiver » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:14 am
pnk wrote: Need one clarification: 7x-2y>0 & x+y>0 => 8x>y (is it correct???)
Yes. Inequalities with the same sign (and only the same sign) can be added (and only added).
Join the discussion