BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

inequality

Expert replies
by rahulg83 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:13 am
If x, y and z are positive integers, is x > z-y?

1) x-y-z>0
2) z^2=x^2+y^2
Last edited by rahulg83 on Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: inequality

by Vemuri » Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:43 am
IMO D.

Stmt1: Can be re-written as x>y+z. Since x,y,z are all positive and if x is greater than the addition of y & z. Then x is surely greater than the subtraction of y & z. Sufficient.

Stmt2: The question can be reframed to as z>y-x. From this statement z^2=x^2+y^2. Lets consider some numbers that satisfy this equation z=5, x=3, y=4 & then try them to see if the question can be answered. 5>4-3, which is true. The same will be the case for any positive numbers you select. So, this statement also is sufficient.
Last edited by Vemuri on Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:28 am
Statement 1:

x - y - z > 0
x > y + z

If x is greater than the sum of y and z, then surely x will be greater than the difference between y and z (since x, y and z are all positive integers). Sufficient

Statement 2:

Notice that this is essentially the pythagorean theorem, and from this we can treat x, y and z as the sides of a right angled triangle, with z being the hypotenuse. In a triangle, we know that the sum of the two shorter sides must be larger than the longest side, in this case the hypotenuse z.

so,

x + y > z
x > z - y

Sufficient.

IMO D. Are you sure of the OA?

-BM-
Last edited by bluementor on Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:38 am
very sorry guys...it should read as x>z-y and not x>y-z
It was a typo..plz see the corrected question now

OA is A

But my answer still D

ststement 2 infers that x, y and z are sides of right angled triangle and we know that sum of any two sides is always greater than third.
so x+y>z for all x,y,z
=> x>z-y
Join the discussion

by shashank.mehra » Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:43 am
Guys any clarity on this??/ what should be the answer
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:01 pm
I agree. I think the answer should be D as well.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by gmatplayer » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:08 pm
I disagree.
For statement 2,

If x= 3, y=4, z=5
Then x>z-y

If x =6, y=8, z=10
Then x=z-y

NOT SUFFICIENT

I think, to my wild imagination, statement 2 is trying confuse us to include pythagoras theory of z^2 = x^2+y^2

And from triangle properties, side of triangle x, y, and z
Always x+y>z
So x>z-y

My answer is (A)
Join the discussion

by gmatplayer » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:11 pm
I miscalculated

if x = 6, y = 8, z =10
x>z-y
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:34 pm
Pythagoras's Theorem would definitely be okay here. From mathematics, we can say that if x, y, z > 0 and x^2 + y^2 = z^2, then x, y, z can ALWAYS be the sides of a right triangle with x, y, z.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by rah_pandey » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:33 pm
I got answer as A but i did not use the pythogorus theorem

from second statement

z-y=x^2/(y+z)

now let us compute

x-(z-y)=(x-(x^2/(y+z)))
=x*(y+z-x)/(y+z)

is positive or negative depending on value of y+z-x

now obviously this does not lead us anywhere so answer can be A

but if you use pythogorus than obviously answer is D. can some instructor throw some light on it. Is it a official guide question. Dont think so? The question is not well thought off.
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:03 am
rah_pandey wrote:I got answer as A but i did not use the pythogorus theorem

from second statement

z-y=x^2/(y+z)

now let us compute

x-(z-y)=(x-(x^2/(y+z)))
=x*(y+z-x)/(y+z)

is positive or negative depending on value of y+z-x

now obviously this does not lead us anywhere so answer can be A

but if you use pythogorus than obviously answer is D. can some instructor throw some light on it. Is it a official guide question. Dont think so? The question is not well thought off.
It is from gmatscore.com
Join the discussion

Re: inequality

by tohellandback » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:12 am
rahulg83 wrote:If x, y and z are positive integers, is x > z-y?

1) x-y-z>0
2) z^2=x^2+y^2
IMO D
1) sufficient.
x-y-z>0
or,x>z+y
so obviously>z-y

2) z^2=x^2+y^2
pythagoras th:
so x+y>z
x>z-y
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by hk » Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:28 am
I got the answer as D..

But i dont think this is a good question!! The rule with the GMAT question is that St.1 and St.2 should not contradict!!!

In this case both the statements are contradicting each other!!

Statement 1 says x-y-z>0, this means that x has to be the largest of the three.
Statement 2 says z^2 = x^2 +y^2 this says that z is the largest.

This type of contradiction is never seen in the real GMAT, GMATPrep or the Official guides.
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion