BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sacx » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:13 am
Stmt I

for x = 0

sqrt((0-3)^2) = 3 -0
3 = 3

for x = 4

sqrt((4-3)^2) = 3 -4
1 does not equal -1

for x = -1

sqrt((-1-3)^2) = 3 - (-1)

4 = 4

So for any value of x > 4, the equation is not True

Insufficient

Stmt II

- x * mod x > 0

for this to be true x = negative, since mod x is always positive

eg: x = -3
-(-3) * mod (-3) = 9 > 0
x = 3

-3 * mod (3) = -9 < 0

Now for any negative value of x, the equation is always True

[spoiler]Sufficient

B[/spoiler]
SACX
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:25 am
am getting D

is sqrt((x-3)^2) = 3 -x ?

simplying the stimulus,
=>(x-3)^(2*1/2)=3-x?
=>x-3=3-x?
=>2x=6 or x=3?


1) x is not equal to 3
sufficient

2) -x * |x| > 0
since |x| always >0, x must be <0
if x<0 , x is a negative number and cant be equal to 3.
sufficient

hence, D
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Sun Apr 05, 2009 4:27 pm
IMO (E).

There is some serious problem with this question. IMO we cannot directly cancel the powers for LHS.

Since, the answer is given as (B), so let me try first to prove statement II as insufficient.

-x * |x| > 0

It clearly means that x should be negative or x < 0

Now suppose, x = -1

then by the given statement, "sqrt((x-3)^2) = 3 -x"

sqrt((-1-3)^2) = 3+1

(-4)^(2/2) = 3+1

if we directly cancels the power for LHS then it means -4 = 4. Which is wrong.

But IMO, we cannot do so, hence, modified equation will be like this...

=> sqrt((-4)^2) = 4
=> sqrt(16) = 4
on doing the square root for LHS, the answer will be +- 4 (i.e. both positive and negative value of 4).

which is again insufficient to deduce the answer.


Same case for statement I.

Hence, in my opinion, answer should be (E) rather (B).

Did I miss something??? Any help will be gratified.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Apr 05, 2009 4:37 pm
sqrt((-1-3)^2) = 3+1

(-4)^(2/2) = 3+1

if we directly cancels the power for LHS then it means -4 = 4. Which is wrong.

sqrt[(x-3)^2] = |x-3|

|x-3| will be equal to 3-x only when x is negative or 0 or x=3

From stmt II we know x is negative therefore stm II becomes SUFF

Hope this helps!

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by Musiq » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:52 am
Very hard question; though I am in agreement with the OA.

This question tests an often forgotten principle that GMAT test-makers love to visually challenge test-takers on. Please see below for an example:

If x^2 = 25, then X has 2 solutions ( +5 and -5)
But,if X = Sqrt (25), then there is only one solution ( +5). This is because it is assumed that SQRT is always positive; which is the case with Real numbers anyway.


So lets, restate the question " Is SQRT ( X - 3) ^ 2 = 3 - X?
LHS can only be positive root; therefore question can be restated as :

Is X -3 = 3-X?

This is the trap that even 700+ test takers will fall into....because even though we are assuming that (X-3), is a positive square root of (X-3) ^2, there is no way of sayng what X is.

So, X - 3 really could be positive, zero or negative depending on what the value of variable X is.

Therefore, the question really boils down to, Is X > +3?

Statement I:
X could be 2 ----- 1 NO
X could be 4 ----- 1 YES
Therefore Insufficiency

Statement II:
Conclusively proves that X is negative. This answers the question with an ALWAYS NO -------> Sufficiency

Therefore answer = B.

I skipped some mathematical steps because other users have already contributed those steps.
For love, not money.
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:22 am
Musiq wrote:Very hard question; though I am in agreement with the OA.

This question tests an often forgotten principle that GMAT test-makers love to visually challenge test-takers on. Please see below for an example:

If x^2 = 25, then X has 2 solutions ( +5 and -5)
But,if X = Sqrt (25), then there is only one solution ( +5). This is because it is assumed that SQRT is always positive; which is the case with Real numbers anyway.

So lets, restate the question " Is SQRT ( X - 3) ^ 2 = 3 - X?
LHS can only be positive root; therefore question can be restated as :

Is X -3 = 3-X?

This is the trap that even 700+ test takers will fall into....because even though we are assuming that (X-3), is a positive square root of (X-3) ^2, there is no way of sayng what X is.

So, X - 3 really could be positive, zero or negative depending on what the value of variable X is.

Therefore, the question really boils down to, Is X > +3?

Statement I:
X could be 2 ----- 1 NO
X could be 4 ----- 1 YES
Therefore Insufficiency

Statement II:
Conclusively proves that X is negative. This answers the question with an ALWAYS NO -------> Sufficiency

Therefore answer = B.

I skipped some mathematical steps because other users have already contributed those steps.
Correct me if i am wrong.. even for real nos. square root of a no. can be -ve .. sqrt 25 can be -5. For real nos. sqrt of negative nos are not defined...like sqrt(-25) is not defined..which is in domain of complex nos....
Join the discussion

by Musiq » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:14 am
2010gmat wrote:
Musiq wrote:Very hard question; though I am in agreement with the OA.

This question tests an often forgotten principle that GMAT test-makers love to visually challenge test-takers on. Please see below for an example:

If x^2 = 25, then X has 2 solutions ( +5 and -5)
But,if X = Sqrt (25), then there is only one solution ( +5). This is because it is assumed that SQRT is always positive; which is the case with Real numbers anyway.

So lets, restate the question " Is SQRT ( X - 3) ^ 2 = 3 - X?
LHS can only be positive root; therefore question can be restated as :

Is X -3 = 3-X?

This is the trap that even 700+ test takers will fall into....because even though we are assuming that (X-3), is a positive square root of (X-3) ^2, there is no way of sayng what X is.

So, X - 3 really could be positive, zero or negative depending on what the value of variable X is.

Therefore, the question really boils down to, Is X > +3?

Statement I:
X could be 2 ----- 1 NO
X could be 4 ----- 1 YES
Therefore Insufficiency

Statement II:
Conclusively proves that X is negative. This answers the question with an ALWAYS NO -------> Sufficiency

Therefore answer = B.

I skipped some mathematical steps because other users have already contributed those steps.
Correct me if i am wrong.. even for real nos. square root of a no. can be -ve .. sqrt 25 can be -5. For real nos. sqrt of negative nos are not defined...like sqrt(-25) is not defined..which is in domain of complex nos....
Sorry for being ambigous ....but it's hard to explain through typing.

I will try again to articulate my thought:

SQRT OF a Single Order Variable(egs: X, Y, a+ b, 3p) on the GMAT is always POSTIVE
SQRT of X^2 has a postive and a negative solution.

In some ways, this goes back to the order of an equation. The number of solutions = the highest exponent of that variable.

So, SQRT of 4 can only be +2.

But, SQRT of 2^2 CAN BE +2 OR -2.

Even though that sounds completely bonkers, it becomes very important when dealing with variables moreso than with constants.
For love, not money.
Join the discussion